Long-term Simulations of the Sulfur Concentrations over the China, Japan and Korea: A Model Comparison Study

Cheol-Hee Kim,Lim-Seok Chang,Jeong-Soo Kim,Fan Meng,Mizuo Kajino,Hiromasa Ueda,Yuanhang Zhang,Hye-Young Son,Youjiang He,Jun Xu,Keiichi Sato,Chang-Keun Song,Soo-Jin Ban,Tatsuya Sakurai,Zhiwei Han,Lei Duan,Suk-Jo Lee,Shang-Gyoo Shim,Young Sunwoo,Tae-Young Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-011-0025-8
IF: 6.6235
2011-01-01
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
Abstract:Three comprehensive acid deposition models were used to simulate the sulfur concentrations over northeast Asia over the period covering entire year of 2002, and discussed the aggregated uncertainties and discrepancies of the three models. The participating models are from the countries participating in the project of Longrange Transboundary Air Pollutants in Northeast Asia (LTP): China, Japan and Korea. The Eulerian Model-3/CMAQ (by China), Regional Air Quality Model (RAQM, by Japan), and Comprehensive Acid Deposition Model (CADM, by Korea) were employed by each country with common emissions data established by the administrative agencies of China, Japan and Korea. The episodic simulation results between 1 to 15, March 2002 are also presented, during which aircraft measurements were carried out over the Yellow sea. The episodic results show both a wide short-term variability in simulations against measurements, and maximum concentration differences of 3∼5 times among the three models, requiring that further attention before confidence among the three models can be claimed for short-term simulations. However, the year-long cumulative simulations showed almost the same general features, with lower aggregated uncertainties between the three models, produced by the long term integration over northeast Asia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?