TOWARD DETECTING THE 2175 Å DUST FEATURE ASSOCIATED WITH STRONG HIGH-REDSHIFT Mg II ABSORPTION LINES

Peng Jiang,Jian Ge,Hongyan Zhou,Junxian Wang,Tinggui Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/732/2/110
2011-01-01
Abstract:We report detections of 39 2175 angstrom dust extinction bump candidates associated with strong MgII absorption lines at z similar to 1-1.8 on quasar spectra in Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR3. These strong MgII absorption line systems are detected among 2951 strong MgII absorbers with a rest equivalent width W-r lambda 2796 > 1.0 angstrom at 1.0 < z < 1.86, which is part of a full sample of 7421 strong MgII absorbers compiled by Prochter et al. The redshift range of the absorbers is chosen to allow the 2175 angstrom extinction features to be completely covered within the SDSS spectrograph operation wavelength range. An upper limit of the background quasar emission redshift at z = 2.1 is set to prevent the Ly alpha forest lines from contaminating the sensitive spectral region for the 2175 angstrom bump measurements. The FM90 parameterization is applied to model the optical/UV extinction curve in the rest frame of MgII absorbers of the 2175 angstrom bump candidates. The simulation technique developed by Jiang et al. is used to derive the statistical significance of the candidate 2175 angstrom bumps. A total of 12 absorbers are detected with 2175 angstrom bumps at a 5 sigma level of statistical significance, 10 are detected at a 4 sigma level, and 17 are detected at a 3 sigma level. Most of the candidate bumps in this work are similar to the relatively weak 2175 angstrom bumps observed in the Large Magellanic Cloud LMC2 supershell rather than the strong ones observed in the Milky Way. This sample has greatly increased the total number of 2175 angstrom extinction bumps measured on SDSS quasar spectra. Follow-up observations may rule out some of the possible false detections and reveal the physical and chemical natures of 2175 angstrom quasar absorbers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?