Abstract:Purpose This study has two primary objectives: (1) to shed light on the mechanism by which authoritarian leadership unfolds its impact on such critical aspects of subordinates' work lives as job satisfaction and in-role performance and (2) to identify the moderating conditions which place limits on the impact of authoritarian leadership on work outcomes. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected on 552 supervisor-subordinate dyads from the United Arab Emirates. A series of research hypotheses were tested using a mixed-method statistical approach, including CFA and moderated hierarchical regression analysis. Findings As predicted, authoritarian leadership exerts negative impact on subordinates' job satisfaction and performance through poor quality LMX and weak employee organizational embeddedness. Both LMX and employee embeddedness mediated the negative relationship between authoritarian leadership and outcome measures while power distance moderated the relationship of authoritarian leadership with LMX and employee organizational embeddedness. Low power distance orientation was found to exacerbate the negative impact of authoritarian leadership on the quality of both LMX relationships and employee embeddedness. Research limitations/implications The study shares limitations of most studies cast in the survey research design. Practical implications The findings underscore the importance of work environment in nurturing high quality LMX relationships and employee organizational embeddedness to buffer the negative effect of authoritarian leadership on subordinates' job satisfaction and performance. In high power distance cultures where workplace inequality is largely rationalized, subordinates who perceive their leaders as authoritarian tend to show low job satisfaction and poor in-role performance. These findings illustrate the importance of management intervention in the early stage of recruitment and selection to attract managers receptive to egalitarian leadership approaches who can equip subordinates with appropriate resources to enhance their job satisfaction and performance outcomes. Originality/value The study offers valuable new insights into the mechanism by which authoritarian leadership influences work outcomes in a high-power distance culture. It represents first systematic effort in the Middle Eastern context to identify the conditions that mediate the linkage between authoritarian leadership and work outcomes. The study adds value to the literature by investigating the moderating role of power distance at the individual level of analysis. It detects significant differences in subordinates' perception of power inequality in the workplace in a culture viewed as a high-power distance culture and illustrates how such differences in turn shape the quality of LMX and employee organizational embeddedness.

Linking Power Distance Orientation and Education Level to Authoritarian Leadership

The Positive Effect of Authoritarian Leadership on Employee Performance: The Moderating Role of Power Distance

The Impact of Authoritarian Leadership on Subordinates'Performance: the Moderating Role of Leader-member Exchange

A dual-stage moderated mediation model linking authoritarian leadership to follower outcomes.

Traditional Chinese leadership and employee voice behavior: A cross-level examination

The Virtue of a Controlling Leadership Style: Authoritarian Leadership, Work Stressors, and Leader Power Distance Orientation

Study on the Relationship Between Authoritarian Leadership Behavior and Subordinates' Organizational Citizenship Behavior-- the Moderating Role of Subordinates' Power Distance

Authoritarian Leadership and Employee Silence in China

Authoritarian Leadership in Projects: an Integrated Model to Understand the Team Members’ Task and Innovative Performance

Linking authoritarian leadership to employee organizational embeddedness, LMX and performance in a high-power distance culture: a mediation-moderated analysis

The Trickle-Down Effect of Authoritarian Leadership on Unethical Employee Behavior: A Cross-Level Moderated Mediation Model

Authoritarian Leadership and Task Performance: the Effects of Leader-Member Exchange and Dependence on Leader

Authoritarian leadership and cyberloafing: A moderated mediation model of emotional exhaustion and power distance orientation

The Roles of Relational Identification and Workgroup Cultural Values in Linking Authoritarian Leadership to Employee Performance

The Influence of Power Distance on Leadership Behavior in China

Power Distance, Workload and Leader Empowering Behavior

When Authoritarian Leadership Fuels Employee Self-interested Voice: The Roles of Authoritarian Type

The Understanding of the Relationship Between Autonomy Orientation and Creativity: the Moderating Effect of Authoritarian Leadership

The typology of school leaders and teachers' outcomes: a latent profile analysis of paternalistic leadership

The Influence of Authoritarian-Benevolent Leadership on Subordinates' Work Engagement: A Social Information Processing Perspective