Abstract:The recently launched Landsat-9 has an important mission of working together with Landsat-8 to reduce the revisit period of Landsat Earth observations to eight days. This requires the data of Landsat-9 to be highly consistent with that of Landsat-8 to avoid bias caused by data inconsistency when the two satellites are simultaneously used. Therefore, this study evaluated the consistency of the surface reflectance (SR) and land surface temperature (LST) data between Landsat-8 and Landsat-9 based on five test sites from different parts of the world using synchronized underfly image pairs of both satellites. Previous cross-comparisons have demonstrated high consistency between the spectral bands of Landsat-8 and Landsat-9, with differences of around 1%. However, it is unclear whether this low deviation will be amplified in subsequent multiband calculations. It is also necessary to determine whether the difference is consistent across different land cover types. Therefore, this study used a three-level cross-comparison approach to specifically examine these concerns. Besides the commonly used band-by-band comparison, which served as the first-level comparison in this study, this approach included a second-level comparison based on the calculations of several indicators and a third-level comparison based on a composite index calculated from the indicators obtained in the second-level comparison. This three-level approach will examine whether the difference found in the first-level per-band comparison would change after the subsequent calculations in the second- and third-level comparisons. The Remote Sensing based Ecological Index (RSEI) was used for this approach because it is a composite index integrating four indicators. The results of this three-level comparison show that the first-level per-band comparison exhibited high consistency between the two satellites' SR data, with an average absolute percent change (PC) of 1.88% and an average R 2 of 0.957 across six bands in the five test sites. This deviation increased to 2.21% in the third-level composite index-based comparison, with R 2 decreasing to 0.956. This indicates that after complex calculations, the deviation between the bands of the two satellites was amplified to some extent. However, when analyzing specific land cover types, notable differences emerged between the two satellites for the water category, with an average absolute PC ranging from 18% to 35% and an R 2 of lower than 0.6. Additionally, there were also nearly 5% differences for the built-up land category, with an average R 2 value of lower than 0.7. The comparison of LST data between both satellites also reveals that the Landsat-9 LST is on average 0.24°C lower than Landsat-8 LST across the five test areas but can be 0.58°C lower in built-up land-dominated areas and 0.42°C higher in desert environments. Overall, the SR and LST data between Landsat-8 and Landsat-9 are consistent. However, their performance varies depending on different land cover types. Caution is needed particularly for water-related research when utilizing both satellites simultaneously. Significant discrepancies may also arise in the areas characterized by deserts and built-up lands.

Difference Analysis of SRTM C-Band DEM and ASTER GDEM for Global Land Cover Mapping

Evaluation of ASTER GDEM Using GPS Benchmarks and SRTM in China

Comparison and Validation of SRTM and ASTER GDEM for a Subtropical Landscape in Southeastern China.

Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEMs, SRTM and ASTER GDEM on Selected Chinese Sites

Quality Assessment Of Three Digital Elevation Models With 30 M Resolution By Taking 12 M Tandem-X Dem As Reference

Global DEMs vary from one to another: an evaluation of newly released Copernicus, NASA and AW3D30 DEM on selected terrains of China using ICESat-2 altimetry data

Accuracy Assessment of High-Resolution Globally Available Open-Source DEMs Using ICESat/GLAS over Mountainous Areas, A Case Study in Yunnan Province, China

A Global Corrected SRTM DEM Product for Vegetated Areas

Evaluation of DEM Accuracy Improvement Methods Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion in Typical Gully Areas of Loess Plateau.

Accuracy Assessment and Correction of SRTM DEM Using ICESat/GLAS Data under Data Coregistration

Srtm Dem Correction in Vegetated Mountain Areas Through the Integration of Spaceborne Lidar, Airborne Lidar, and Optical Imagery

Accuracy Assessment of SRTM DEM, ASTER GDEM, AW3D30 DSM, and TanDEM-X 90 M DEM Based on Runway Elevation Data

Comparison of five methods for improving the accuracy of SRTM3 DEM and TanDEM-X DEM in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau using ICESat-2 data

ICESat-2 Controlled Integration of GEDI and SRTM Data for Large-Scale Digital Elevation Model Generation

A Batch Postprocessing Method Based on an Adaptive Data Partitioning Strategy for DEM Differencing From Global Data Products

A practical method for SRTM DEM correction over vegetated mountain areas

Performance assessment of global open‐access digital elevation models in China mainland coastal region

Reconstruction and Evaluation of DEMs From Bistatic Tandem-X SAR in Mountainous and Coastal Areas of China

Vertical accuracy of open-source remote sensing data (AW3D30, TanDEM-X, ATLAS) for understory terrain estimation

Cross-comparison of Landsat-8 and Landsat-9 data: a three-level approach based on underfly images

Super-resolution Reconstruction of a 3 Arc-Second Global DEM Dataset.