How is a co-methyl intermediate formed in the reaction of cobalamin-dependent methionine synthase? Theoretical evidence for a two-step methyl cation transfer mechanism.

Shi-Lu Chen,Margareta R A Blomberg,Per E M Siegbahn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp105729e
2011-01-01
Abstract:A methyl-Co(cobalamin) species has been characterized to be a crucial intermediate in the last step of the de novo biosynthesis of methionine catalyzed by cobalamin-dependent methionine synthase (MetH). However, exactly how it is formed is still an open question. In the present article, the formation of the methyl-Co(cobalamin) species in MetH has been investigated with B3LYP* hybrid DFT including van der Waals (vdW) interactions (i.e., dispersion) and using a chemical model built on X-ray crystal structures. The methyl cation and radical transfer mechanisms have been examined in various protonation states. The calculations reveal that the CH3-Co(III)(cobalamin) formation in MetH proceeds along a stepwise pathway, where the first step is a methyl cation transfer from the protonated methyltetrahydrofolate (CH3-THF) substrate to the Co(I)cobalamin. The second step is a binding of His759 to the other side (a-face) of Co. The former methyl transfer is computed to be the rate-limiting step with a barrier of 18 kcal/mol, which is reduced to 13 kcal/mol when dispersion is included. For the first step, the protonation at the methyl-bound nitrogen of CH3-THF is very important. The methyl transfer is otherwise unreachable with a very high barrier of similar to 38 kcal/mol. The deprotonation of the alpha-face His759-Asp757-Ser810 triad is found to be much less significant but slightly facilitates the CH3-Co(III)Cbl formation. There has been a long-standing discrepancy of 10-20 kcal/mol between theory and experiment in previous B3LYP computations of the Co C bond dissociation energy for the methyl-Co(cobalamin) species. The calculations indicate that the lack of dispersion (similar to 11 kcal/mol) is the main origin of this puzzling problem. With these effects, B3LYP* gives a bond strength of 32 kcal/mol compared to the experimental value of 37 +/- 3 kcal/mol. Overall, the present calculations give many examples of dispersion that makes non-negligible contributions to the energetics of enzyme reactions, especially for systems involving at least one large reacting fragment approaching or departing.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?