Ferrocenyl-substituted curcumin: can it influence antioxidant ability to protect DNA?

Pei-Ze Li,Zai-Qun Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.02.041
IF: 7.088
2011-01-01
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Abstract:The antioxidant capacities of ferrocenyl-substituted curcumin derivatives including 1,7-bis(p-hydroxy-m-methoxyphenyl)-4-ferrocenylidene-hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (FCU), 1-(p-hydroxy-m-methoxyphenyl)-3-hydroxy-7-ferrocenyl-hepta-1,4,6-trien-5-one (FFT), and 1-(p-hydroxy-m-methoxyphenyl)-5-ferrocenyl-penta-1,4-dien-3-one (FDZ) were evaluated in 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane hydrochloride) (AAPH), Cu2+/glutathione (GSH), and hydroxyl radical (OH)-induced oxidation of DNA, and in trapping 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate) cationic radical (ABTS+), and galvinoxyl radicals. FCU, FFT, and FDZ protected DNA against Cu2+/GSH-induced oxidation, but promoted OH-induced oxidation of DNA. FCU, FFT, and FDZ scavenged 9.5, 5.7, and 4.7 radicals in protecting DNA against AAPH-induced oxidation. FCU can trap more DPPH and ABTS+ than FDZ and FFT, whereas FCU, FFT, and FDZ cannot react with galvinoxyl radical. Both phenolic hydroxyl groups and iron atom in ferrocenylidene curcumin derivatives play antioxidant role in this case.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?