Reduction-degradable linear cationic polymers as gene carriers prepared by Cu(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition.

Yang Wang,Rui Zhang,Ning Xu,Fu-Sheng Du,Ying-Li Wang,Ying-Xia Tan,Shou-Ping Ji,De-Hai Liang,Zi-Chen Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bm101005j
2011-01-01
Biomacromolecules
Abstract:Linear reduction-degradable cationic polymers with different secondary amine densities (S2 and S3) and their nonreducible counterparts (C2 and C3) were synthesized by Cu(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) step-growth polymerization of the dialkyne-oligoamine monomers and the diazide monomers. These polymers were studied with a goal of developing a set of new gene carriers. The buffering capacity and DNA binding ability of these polymers were evaluated by acid base titration, gel retardation, and ethidium bromide (EB) exclusion assay. The polymers with lower amine density exhibit a weaker DNA-binding ability but a stronger buffering capacity in the range of pH 5.1 and 7.4. Particle size and zeta-potential measurements demonstrate that the polymers with higher amine density condense pDNA to form polyplexes with smaller sizes, while the disulfide bond in the backbone shows a negative effect on the condensing capability of the polymers, resulting in the formation of polyplexes with large size and nearly neutral surface. The reduction-sensitive polyplexes formed by polymer S2 of S3 can be disrupted by dithiothreitol (DTT) to release free DNA, which has been proven by the combination of gel retardation, EB exclusion assay, particles sizing, and zeta potential measurements. Cell viability measurements by MTT assay demonstrate that the reduction-degradable polymers (S2 and S3) have little cytotoxicity while the nonreducible polymers (C2 and C3) show obvious cytotoxicity, in particular, at high N/P ratios. In vitro transfection efficiencies of these polymers were evaluated using EGFP and luciferase plasmids as the reporter genes. Polymers S3 and S2 show much higher efficiencies than the nonreducible polymers C3 and C2 in the absence of 10% serum; unexpectedly, the lowest transfection efficiency has been observed for polymer S3 in the presence of serum.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?