Prevalence of Diabetes and Prediabetes Mellitus in the First-degree Relatives of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Chengdu

Hong Ma,Yuan Gong,Yuan-yuan Liu,Jie Song,Hao-ming Tian,Tao Chen,Xing-wu Ran,Hong-ling Yu,Xiang-xun Zhang,Yan Ren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13464/j.scuxbyxb.2011.02.017
2011-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes mellitus in the first-degree relatives (FDR) of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Chengdu. METHODS:A cross-sectional study was undertaken in Chengdu. A total of 2306 adults were recruited, including 535 FDR of T2DM patients and 1771 people without a family history of diabetes. All participants received glucose tolerance tests and measurements of waist, blood pressure and blood lipids. RESULTS:(1) The FDR of T2DM patients had greater standardized prevalence of diabetes than those without a family history of diabetes (26.6% vs. 9.2%). The standardized prevalence of prediabetes in these two groups was 15.0% and 14.1%, respretively. (2) Greater standardized prevalence of diabetes were found in both female (25.5%) and male (28.5%) FDR of T2DM patients compared with their counterparts without a family history of diabetes (women 8.7%, men 11.2%). The standardized prevalence of prediabetes between those with and without a family history of diabetes was 15.9% and 13.4% in women, 13.7% and 15.3% in men, respretively. (3) The younger than 40 years old FDR of T2DM patients had greater prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes than their counterpart without a family history of diabetes, while the FDR of T2DM with an age of > or =40 years old had greater prevalence of diabetes than their counterparts only (P > 0.05). The FDR of T2DM patients with <25 kg/m2 body mass index (BMI) had greater prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes than their counterparts without a family history of diabetes (25.1% vs. 7.4%, 13.2% vs. 9.3%, P < 0.05). The FDR of T2DM patients with > or = 25 kg/m2 BMI had greater prevalence of diabetes (33.0% vs. 13.7%, P < 0.05) but less prevalence of prediabetes (19.2% vs. 26.8%, P < 0.05) than their counterparts without a family history of diabetes. (4) The logistic regression showed that triglyceride (TG) was a risk factor for diabetes in those FDR of T2DM patients (OR = 1.363) and those without a family history of diabetes (OR = 1.27), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was a protective factor for diabetes in those without a family history of diabetes (OR = 0.546). CONCLUSION:The FDR of T2DM patients have high risk of diabetes and those younger than 40 years or with <25 kg/m2 BMI also have high risk of prediabetes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?