Studies on Comparative Genomic Hybridization between Multiple Types of Paclitaxel-resistant Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells and the Parent Cell Lines

LI Wei,MA Yanhong,DONG Yunpeng,ZHANG Xinli,TAN Guolin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.05.001
2011-01-01
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:Objective: Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a new molecular and cellular technology developed from fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). It is a molecular cytogenetics method used to examine genomic imbalances, especially the deletion and amplification of chromosomes, and to locate these alterations in certain chromosome regions. To completely understand the possible differences in genomic DNA between three paclitaxel-resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines (CNE1/Taxol, HNE2/Taxol, 5-8F/Taxol) and corresponding parent cells (CNE1, HNE2, 5-8F) which were sensitive to paclitaxel medication, and the significance of the differences in nasopharyngeal carcinoma acquired drug-resistance, the genomic DNA of three paclitaxel-resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines and their parent cell lines were detected and analyzed using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Methods: The three paclitaxel-resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines (CNE1/Taxol, HNE2/Taxol, 5-8F/Taxol) were created by combining high-dose pulse therapy in the parent cells with stepwise dose increments of paclitaxel. The resistance index was determined by colony formation. Cell CGH was performed on paclitaxel-resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines and the parent cell lines to explore the changes in chromosomal DNA regions. Results: The resistance indices of the three paclitaxel-resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines (CNE1/Taxol, HNE2/Taxol, 5-8F/Taxol) were 8.43, 8.27 and 5.26, respectively. There were extensive chromosomal changes in the three parent cell lines when compared to normal genomic DNA, mainly seen in the co-amplification of 3q21-qter, 5p13-pter, 12 and 20q11-qter, and the common deletion of 10q11-qter, 18 and X in all three parent cell lines. However, the three paclitaxel-resistant cell lines showed a relatively normal karyotype with changes mainly in the co-amplification of 3q21-qter, 5p13-pter, 12, 20q11-qter and 8q21-qter. Compared with the common amplifications in parent cell lines, a new co-amplification of 8q21-qter was detected in the three paclitaxel-resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines. Conclusion: Co-amplification of 3q21-qter, 5p13-pter, 12 and 20q11-qter, and deletion of 10q11-qter, 18, and X may be associated with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chromosomal amplification of 8q21-qter may be related to paclitaxel-resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines. Further studies on these chromosome regions may supply new clues on the occurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and the mechanism of acquired resistance of nasopharyngeal carcinoma to paclitaxel.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?