Comparison of two blood cell separators in collection of peripheral blood stem cell/progenitor cells and effectiveness of transplantation

Shu-lai Ye,Mei-ai Ying,Jia-ping Chen,Liang-quan Geng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.23.039
2011-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood stem cells/progenitor cells were collected in vitro using blood cell separators, which directly affects the features and quantity of collected cells, additionally, affects hematopoietic reconstitution of recipients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiencies of Fenwal CS-3000 Plus and Amicus blood cell separators in collecting peripheral blood stem cells/progenitor cells and effectiveness of transplantation. METHODS: Totally 51 cases received allogenic peripheral blood stem cells transplantation were selected, including 27 cases, mean aged (34.2±10.6) years, who performed stem cell apheresis procedures using Fenwal CS-3000 Plus blood cell separator and 24 donors, mean aged (35.4±12.1) years, using Amicus blood cell separator. The number of nucleated cells and CD34 + cells, collection efficiency, collection amount of red blood cell and the time of the hematopoieteic reconstitution of two devices were compared. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the total number of nucleated cells and CD34 + cells, collection efficiency, collection amount of red blood cell and the time of the hematopoieteic reconstitution between the two devices. However, the amount of platelet in the stem/progenitor cell products of the Fenwal CS-3000Plus group was obviously greater than that of the Amicus group (P < 0.01). There is no difference in the collection efficiencies of the two blood cell separators in the peripheral blood stem cells/progenitor cell and the effectiveness of transplantation. The Amicus cell separator is better for the donors with thrombocytopenia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?