Comparative Study of Headspace and Headspace Single Drop Microextraction Combined with GC for the Determination of Methanol in Wine.
Benyuan Qin,Xiaoyu Wang,Lu Tang,Sainan Wang,Ying Shi,Liyan Zhao,Hongmei Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463079
IF: 4.601
2022-01-01
Journal of Chromatography A
Abstract:In this work, headspace single-drop microextraction (HS-SDME) method and headspace (HS) method were developed and compared to determine methanol by gas chromatography with flame ionization de-tector (GC-FID). Several factors influencing extraction efficiency, such as extraction time, temperature, sample volume, stirring rate and extraction solvent were investigated and the optimal conditions could be obtained using 2.0 mu L DMF as extractant, 45 C as heating temperature, 5 min as extraction time, 6 mL sample volume and 1.5 g KCl as addition of salt. The obtained dynamic range of HS-SDME-GC-FID was from 0.05 to 2 mg.L-1 with the limit of detection (LOD) of 0.001 mg(-1) and that of HS-GC-FID was from 10.0 to 400.0 mg L-1 with LOD of 0.5 mg.L-1. The relative standard deviations (RSD) of HS-SDME-GC-FID was 1.9% ( n = 5, C = 0.005 mg & BULL;L -1), 4.8%( n = 5, C = 0.02 mg.L-1) and 3.3%( n = 5, C = 0.1 mg.L-1), then the RSD of HS-GC-FID was 4.4%( n = 5, C = 5 mg.L -1), 5.8%( n = 5, C = 20 mg.L (-1)) and 4.0%( n = 5, C = 40 mg.L-1). Clearly, compared with HS-GC-FID, HS-SDME-GC-FID possessed lower LOD and better re-producibility and both of them were applied to determine methanol in imported wine and the recoveries for the spiked samples were between 83.99 and 117.24%. Overall, HS-SDME approach was confirmed to be a more sensitive and efficient sample pretreatment method and could separate matrix effectively. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.