Effects of inactivation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator on renal ischemia reperfusion injury in mice

Li Zhou,Ming Zhang,Jie-xue Zhou,Jia-qing Wu,Cheng Li,Shan-dong Meng,Sheng Shen,Dong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.18.024
2011-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: It is a hot investigation to many scholars that how to cure and prevent renal ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI) in a utility way, but the mechanism is unclear at present. The investigation indicates that hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) plays an important role during this process. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects and possible mechanism of HIFs on renal ischemia reperfusion injury in mice. METHODS: Two kinds of mice were selected: one kind was aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) gene inactivation, and the other kind was used as controls. Each kind of mice were randomly divided into sham operation group, ischemic reperfusion group, ischemic reperfusion+ recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) group, ischemic reperfusion+0.9% normal saline (NS) group. Mice were established for renal IRI models. Serum erythropoietin (EPO) levels after 1 hour and 24-hour serum creatinine (Cr) values were examined, 24-hour renal tubular injury score following PAS staining was recorded, and 24-hour renal tubular cell apoptosis was counted by using TUNEL method. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: One hour after reperfusion ARNT knockout serum EPO levels were significantly lower than the control group (P < 0.01). At 24 hours, Cr levels of ARNT knockout mice were significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.01). Renal Tubular injury scores of ARNT knockout group were significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.01). The number of TUNEL positive cells of ARNT knockout group was significantly more than the control group (P < 0.01). After rhEPO injection, there were no significant difference between ARNT knockout mice and control mice (P > 0.05). The results showed that HIF system on renal ischemia reperfusion injury has important protective role. It may be the maximum protective effect mediated by EPO.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?