Abstract:There are close dynamic relationships among the livelihood, well-being, and ecological environment of farmer households. It is of great significance to scientifically clarify the impact of the Grain for Green policy on the livelihoods and well-being of farmer households in mountainous areas. Based on data from a survey of 392 farmer households in Zhangbei County, the system of indicators for livelihood assets and well-being of farmer households were constructed using the sustainable livelihood framework (SLF). The livelihood assets and well-being levels of different types of farmer households were measured, and a multiple linear regression model was used to analyze the impact of the Grain for Green policy implementation on the well-being levels of farmer households. The results showed that (1) the Grain for Green project caused changes in the livelihood of farmer households. The average livelihood diversity of farmer households was 3.008, and the returned farmland households (3.022) were higher than the nonreturned farmland households (2.975) in Zhangbei County. The level of natural assets among the total average livelihood assets of farmer households was the highest at 0.374, while the level of physical assets was the lowest at 0.018. The level of livelihood assets of returned farmland households (0.948) was lower than that of nonreturned farmland households (1.117). (2) The Grain for Green policy had an improving effect on the level of well-being of farmer households, but the effect was not significant. The level of well-being of all farmer households in Zhangbei County was 0.517, with the level of wealth contributing the most to the well-being of farmer households at 40.20% and the quality of the ecological environment contributing the least at 11.99%. The level of well-being of returned farmland households (0.518) was slightly higher than that of nonreturned farmland households (0.514). (3) The influencing degree of each factor on the level of well-being varied significantly. There are three main paths through which the Grain for Green policy affects the well-being of farmer households: by reallocating human assets, optimizing natural assets, and enhancing financial assets. The factor of household size had the highest degree, at 0.366, while educational attainment of household members, household labor capacity, annual household expenditure, livelihood diversity, number of large production tools, and total value of livestock were also important drivers of household well-being, and area of arable land was negatively associated with household well-being. There were also differences in the factors influencing the level of well-being of different types of farmer households.

Food security and farmers' income: Impacts of the grain for green programme on rural households in China

Continuous Decline in Direct Incomes for Farmers Threatens the Sustainability of the Grain for Green Project

Has “Grain for Green” threaten food security on the Loess Plateau of China?

Coupling Farmer Livelihood and Ecosystem Conservation in the Rural Community of Northwest China

[Grain for Green Project: willingness evaluation of the farmers in northern Shaanxi Province of China]

Significant trade-off for the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services in North-western Yunnan, China

Impacts of China’s Grain for Green Program on Migration and Household Income

The Impact of China’s Grain for Green Program on Rural Economy and Precipitation: A Case Study of Yan River Basin in the Loess Plateau

Conservation Payments, Off-Farm Labor, and Ethnic Minorities: Participation and Impact of the Grain for Green Program in China

The Chinese Grain for Green Programme: assessing the carbon sequestered via land reform

The Impact of the Grain for Green Program on Farmers’ Well-Being and Its Mechanism—Empirical Analysis Based on CLDS Data

Impact of the Grain for Green Project on the Well-Being of Farmer Households: A Case Study of the Mountainous Areas of Northern Hebei Province, China

Are the poor benefiting from China's land conservation program?

The Effect of the Grain for Green Program on Ecosystem Health in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Basin: A Case Study of Eastern Sichuan, China

Conservation Payments, Off-Farm Employment And Household Welfare For Farmers Participating In The "Grain For Green" Program In China Empirical Evidence From The Loess Plateau

Water conservation policy and agricultural economic growth: Evidence of grain to green project in China

Change of Cultivated Land and Its Impacts on Agricultural Bioproductivity in China:Implications to National Grain Security

Farm households? willingness to participate in China?s Grain-for-Green Program under different compensation scenarios

Farm households’ willingness to participate in China's Grain-for-Green Program under different compensation scenarios

Chinese Grain for Green Program Led to Highly Increased Soil Organic Carbon Levels: a Meta-Analysis.

Grain for Green Versus Grain: Conflict Between Food Security and Conservation Set-Aside in China