Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the technical efficiency and production risk in China's rice production and examine the effect of factor market reform on these two agricultural performance metrics. Design/methodology/approach Using an unbalanced farm-level panel data with 2,193 observations on 329 rice farms from 2004 to 2016, the authors estimate a translog stochastic production frontier model that accounts for both technical inefficiency and production risk. A one-step procedure through the maximum likelihood method that combines the stochastic production frontier, technical inefficiency and production risk functions is used to circumvent the bias problem often found in the conventional two-step model. Findings Estimation results show that both land and labor market reforms significantly improved the level of technical efficiency over the years, although the effect of land market deregulation is of a much higher magnitude compared to the latter. The land market reform, however, has also increased the risk of production. The authors further find that a higher proportion of hired labor in total labor cost helps lower production risk, while also acting to decrease technical efficiency. Additionally, agricultural subsidies not only increased the output variability but also lowered technical efficiency Originality/value First, the authors evaluate the effect of market deregulation on technical efficiency and production risk under a stochastic frontier framework that simultaneously accounts for both production performance metrics, which is important from a statistical point of view. Further, the authors exploit both cross-sectional and time-series variations in a panel setting to more accurately estimate the technical inefficiency scores and production risk for individual farmers, and investigate how the exogenous land and labor market reforms influence these two production performance measures in China's rice farming. This is the first study in the literature to analyze these questions under a panel framework.

The Impact of Land Reallocation on Technical Efficiency: Evidence from China

Land Reallocation and Its Impacts on Technical Efficiency --Evidence from China's Agricultural Production

Land Reallocation and Its Impacts on Technical Efficiency --evidence from China’s Agricultural Production

Land Use Regulation, Land Reclamation, and Industrial Productivity: Evidence from China

How Does Land Rental Affect Agricultural Labor Productivity? an Empirical Study in Rural China

Clearance of Cyclopentyladenosine and Cyclohexyladenosine in Rats Following a Single Subcutaneous Dose

The Micro Administrative Mechanism of Land Reallocation in Land Consolidation: A Perspective from Collective Action

The Impact of Land Security and Input Allocation on Farm Household Income

How Does the Land Rental Market Participation Affect Household Efficiency? Evidence from Rural China

Efficiency and Distribution of Rural Construction Land Marketization in Contemporary China

Impacts of Rural–Urban Labour Transfer and Land Transfer on Land Efficiency in China: A Analysis of Mediating Effects

Do Land Markets Improve Land-Use Efficiency? Evidence from Jiangsu, China

Deregulation, technical efficiency and production risk in rice farming: evidence from Zhejiang Province, China

Determinants of Factor Misallocation in Agricultural Production and Implications for Agricultural Supply‐side Reform in China

Technical Efficiency Versus Land-Use Efficiency: A Spatio-Temporal Efficiency Analysis of China’s Crop Production

Scale Effects, Technical Efficiency and Land Lease in China

Land Reallocation Reform in Rural China: A Behavioral Economics Perspective

Property Rights, Land Misallocation, and Agricultural Efficiency in China

The effects of land transfer on technical efficiency

Land Tenure Security and Technical Efficiency: New Insights from a Case Study in Northwest China

Market-oriented reform and land use efficiency: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design