Postharvest UV-B irradiation maintains sensory qualities and enhances antioxidant capacity in tomato fruit during storage
Changhong Liu,Xiaoxu Han,Luyun Cai,Xianying Lu,Tiejin Ying,Zhenhui Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.09.003
IF: 6.751
2011-01-01
Postharvest Biology and Technology
Abstract:Mature-green tomato fruit ( Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Zhenfen 202) were exposed to different doses of UV-B irradiation (10, 20, 40 and 80 kJ/m 2 ) and stored in the dark at 14 °C, 95% RH for up to 37 d. Of the four doses, 20 or 40 kJ/m 2 was most effective in maintaining a high level of firmness and delaying the colour development. Furthermore, 20 or 40 kJ/m 2 promoted the accumulation of total phenolics and total flavonoids, and enhanced antioxidant capacity during storage, though UV-B irradiation could reduce the ascorbic acid content. A dose of 10 kJ/m 2 had similar effects but to a lesser extent. The highest dose of 80 kJ/m 2 resulted in higher lycopene content, but showed negative effects on texture, colour, and other antioxidants. The optimum dose of UV-B for maintaining sensory qualities and enhancing antioxidant capacity was 20 or 40 kJ/m 2 . These results suggest that UV-B irradiation appears to be a useful non-chemical way of maintaining postharvest quality and enhancing antioxidant capacity in tomato fruit. Keywords Tomato Postharvest UV-B irradiation Sensory qualities Antioxidants Storage 1 Introduction Tomato fruit ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) is a versatile vegetable that is consumed fresh as well as in the form of processed products ( Toor and Savage, 2005 ). It is among the most popularly consumed fruit in the world and as such could be considered as an important source of dietary antioxidants ( Lenucci et al., 2006 ). Tomato components such as lycopene, phenolics, flavonoids and vitamins C and E are mainly responsible for the antioxidant activity of raw tomatoes and processed tomato products ( Leonardi et al., 2000; Stewart et al., 2000 ). Results from epidemiological studies have shown that high consumption of tomato fruit is consistently correlated with a reduced risk of some types of cancer ( Franceschi et al., 1994 ) and may account for a low incidence of ischemic heart disease ( Gerster, 1997 ). In recent years, increasing attention has been paid by consumers and researchers to the health and nutritional aspects (vitamins content, mineral elements, antioxidants, etc.) of horticultural products ( Scalzo et al., 2005 ). Interest in the role of antioxidants in human health has promoted research in the field of horticulture and food science to evaluate fruit and vegetable antioxidants and to determine how their content and activity can be maintained or even improved through crop breeding, cultural practices, and postharvest storage and processing ( Ayala-Zavala et al., 2004 ). Previous studies have reported that postharvest UV-B irradiation retained the green colour of broccoli florets during storage ( Aiamla-or et al., 2009, 2010 ), increased the content of potentially health-promoting phenolics of grapes ( Cantos et al., 2000 ) and the concentration of vitamin D 2 in mushrooms ( Mau et al., 1998; Ko et al., 2008; Roberts et al., 2008 ), improved the health value of apples ( Hagen et al., 2007 ) and nasturtium ( Schreiner et al., 2009 ), and enhanced the level of antioxidant compounds and antioxidant enzyme activity in plants ( Costa et al., 2002; Xu et al., 2008 ). Furthermore, in comparison with UV-C, UV-B is a less harmful waveband, and may represent a new practical approach for maintaining the postharvest quality of fruit and vegetables. Recently, treatment with UV-C has been reported to maintain postharvest quality ( Maharaj et al., 1999; Barka et al., 2000 ), increase ascorbic acid and total phenolic contents ( Jagadeesh et al., 2009 ), and improve nutritional qualities ( Liu et al., 2009 ) of tomato fruit. However, to our knowledge, there is no published data on the effect of postharvest UV-B irradiation on sensory qualities and antioxidant capacity of tomato fruit. Therefore, the objective of this research was to investigate the potential of postharvest UV-B irradiation on sensory qualities and antioxidant capacity of tomato fruit during storage. 2 Materials and methods 2.1 Tomato fruit handling and irradiation with UV-B Mature-green tomato fruit ( Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Zhenfen 202) were harvested manually from plants grown in a commercial greenhouse in Jiashan County, China (120.92°E, 30.84°N) in March 2010. The cover material of the greenhouse was 0.1 mm polyethylene (PE) film with a reported UV-B transmissibility of 25.7% ( Li and Zou, 2009 ). Fruit of uniform shape and size and free from fungal infection were selected, and transported for a short distance to the laboratory. The fruit were then washed in tap water and air-dried at ambient temperature using a fan. Irradiation was carried out on the second day of harvest and under ambient conditions. UV-B irradiation was provided by two UV-B lamp tubes (TL 20W/01 RS with a spectral peak at 311 nm, Philips) installed closely parallel to each other and above the height-adjustable sample plate. A wooden box covered with aluminum foil and supported by a metal framework enclosed the UV-B lamps, reflectors, and sample plate, providing protection for the operator. Fruit were placed firstly with their calyx ends up and approximately 20 cm under the lamps. Uniformity of irradiation intensity and dose for all fruit samples were ensured by aligning the fruit samples parallel to the lamp tubes at equal distance, and making sure that the length of the fruit line was reasonably shorter than the length of the lamp tubes. The UV-B irradiation intensity was measured by a portable digital radiometer for UV-B band (TAINA TN-2340, TAINA Co., Ltd., Taiwan, China) at the three quarter fruit height level, which was chosen to represent the average irradiation intensity of the exposed hemisphere of the fruit. Doses variation was realized by fixing the distance from fruit to lamp tubes at an appropriate level to acquire a designated irradiation intensity (6.0 ± 0.1 W/m 2 ), and altering the exposure time. At half the calculated exposure time, each fruit was rotated 180° vertically so that their blossom ends had an equal chance to face the lamp to ensure uniform irradiation. Prior to irradiation treatment, the UV-B lamps were allowed to stabilize by turning on for least 30 min. Irradiation doses corresponding to 10, 20, 40 and 80 kJ/m 2 were used in this study. Thirty-six fruit were treated in each irradiation dose with nine fruit treated for each irradiation batch. Untreated fruit were considered as controls. After irradiation, fruit were placed in a box for up to 37 d in the dark at 14 °C and 95% RH. 2.2 Tomato fruit sampling On each of the specified sampling days (7, 14, 21, 28 or 37 d), six fruit were randomly chosen from the untreated and the UV-B treated groups. The edible pericarp from the equatorial region of the sampled tomato fruit was excised. After complete removal of the parenchyma, the pericarp was cut into small pieces and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Frozen samples were kept at −70 °C for subsequent analysis of various antioxidant components. All analyses were conducted in triplicate. 2.3 Texture and colour measurement A penetration test was performed on the skin of whole fruit using a TA.XT2i texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, UK) with a 5 mm diameter cylindrical probe. Samples were penetrated to a depth of 15 mm. The speed of the probe was 1.0 mm/s during the pre-test and penetration. Force and time data were recorded with Texture Expert (Version 1.0) from Stable Micro Systems. From the force versus time curves, firmness was defined as the maximum force in newtons (N). Four determinations were made on each fruit away from the locular ridge. Fruit surface colour values were measured using a WSC-S Colourimeter (Shanghai precision instrument Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) and average readings at four predetermined points on the equator of each fruit were recorded. Hunter L *, a *, b * values were obtained, and colour was expressed as the a */ b * ratio. Six fruit were tested for each irradiation treatment for all of the above tests. 2.4 Total phenolics and flavonoids Total phenolics and flavonoids were extracted and determined according to the methods of Toor and Savage (2005) . Total phenolic contents were expressed as gallic acid equivalents, in mg/100 g fresh weight (FW). Total flavonoid contents were expressed as rutin equivalents, in mg/100 g FW. 2.5 Lycopene Lycopene from the fruit samples was extracted with hexane:ethanol:acetone (2:1:1), containing 2.5% BHT (butylated hydroxy toluene). Optical density of the hexane extract was measured spectrophotometrically at 472 nm against a hexane blank. Concentration of lycopene was calculated using an extinction coefficient ( E %) of 3450 ( Toor and Savage, 2005 ). Results were expressed as mg/100 g FW. 2.6 Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid was measured by titration using phenolindo-2,6-dichlorophenol (DPIP) ( Jagadeesh et al., 2009 ). Five grams of frozen fruit sample was homogenized with 20 mL of a buffer solution containing 1 g/L of oxalic acid and 4 g/L of anhydrous sodium acetate. The fruit sample was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. An aliquot fraction of the extract was titrated against a solution containing 295 mg/L DPIP and 100 mg/L sodium bicarbonate. A solution containing 0.10 mg/mL ascorbic acid of the buffer solution was used as the standard to quantify ascorbic acid in the fruit samples. The extracts were at all times protected from light with aluminum foil to avoid oxidation. Results were expressed as mg/100 g FW. 2.7 Antioxidant capacity assays 2.7.1 Ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) assay The FRAP assay was performed following the method described by Alothman et al. (2009) . Briefly, a 40 μL aliquot of diluted fruit extract was mixed with 3.6 mL FRAP reagent and the reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The absorbance then was determined at 593 nm against blank of water. The FRAP reagent was freshly prepared by mixing a 10 mM 2,4,6-tris (1-pyridyl)-5-triazine (TPTZ) solution in 40 mM HCl with a 20 mM FeCl 3 ·6H 2 O solution and 0.3 M acetate buffer (pH 3.6) in the ratio of 1:1:10. A calibration curve was prepared using an aqueous solution of ferrous sulphate FeSO 4 ·7H 2 O. Values were expressed as mM/100 g FW. 2.7.2 2,2-Di-(4-tert-octylphenyl)-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical assay The DPPH assay is not specific to any particular antioxidant component, so it reflects the overall antioxidant capacity of a sample. This determination was based on the method described by Odriozola-Serrano et al. (2008) . 0.2 mL fruit extract was mixed with 2.8 mL of 60 μM ethanolic DPPH. The homogenate was shaken vigorously and kept in darkness for 30 min. The absorption of the sample at 515 nm was measured with a spectrophotometer against a blank of water. Results were expressed as percentage of DPPH radical inhibition (DPPH %). 2.7.3 β-Carotene–linoleic acid assay Two grams of frozen fruit sample were homogenized with 80% ethanol. Then the mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min. Antioxidant capacity was determined according to the β-carotene bleaching method as described by Kaur and Kapoor (2002) . 2 mg β-Carotene was dissolved in 10 mL of chloroform. A 1 mL aliquot of the solution was added to a conical flask with 20 mg linoleic acid and 200 mg Tween-40. Chloroform was removed in a rotary evaporator at 50 °C. Oxygenated distilled water (50 mL) was added to the β-carotene emulsion and mixed well. Aliquots (4.8 mL) of the oxygenated β-carotene emulsion and 0.2 mL of fruit extract were placed in capped culture tubes and mixed well. The tubes were immediately placed in a water-bath and incubated at 50 °C. Oxidation of the β-carotene emulsion was monitored spectrophotometrically by taking absorbance at 20 min intervals at 470 nm for 100 min. The control consisted of 4.8 mL of the oxygenated β-carotene emulsion and 0.2 mL distilled water instead of fruit extract. Antioxidant capacity was expressed as percentage inhibition relative to control using the equation: AA ( % ) = degradation rate of control − degradation rate of sample degradation rate of control where degradation rate = ln ( a / b ) × 1/ t , a = initial absorbance (470 nm), b = absorbance (470 nm) at 100 min interval, t = time (min). 2.8 Statistical analysis Values were expressed as means ± standard deviations. Data were analyzed using SAS (Statistical Analysis System) software. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's multiple range test were used to compare significance of the difference between the samples. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Effect of UV-B irradiation on texture and colour of tomato fruit during storage For fresh tomato fruit, the two quality attributes that are most important to consumers are texture and skin colour ( Tijskens and Evelo, 1994 ). In the present study, tomato fruit gradually softened when stored at low temperature ( Table 1 ). However, UV-B irradiation (20 and 40 kJ/m 2 ) maintained a significantly higher level ( P < 0.01) of fruit firmness than untreated and 80 kJ/m 2 UV-B treated fruit between day 14 and 37. And the difference between 20 and 40 kJ/m 2 UV-B irradiation was not significant ( P > 0.05). Between day 14 and 37, UV-B irradiation with the highest dose (80 kJ/m 2 ) resulted in the lowest fruit firmness. After 37 d of storage, residual firmness levels with UV-B irradiation (20 and 40 kJ/m 2 ) were both 36% of the initial value as compared with 32% in untreated fruit. The softening of tomato fruit can be related to the production of free radicals as a result of senescence ( Leshem et al., 1986 ) and its effect on the cell wall. Barka et al. (2000) observed a reduction in activity of cell wall-degrading enzymes, i.e. polygalacturonase, pectin methyl esterase, cellulase, xylanase, β- d -galactosidase and protease in tomato fruit treated with UV irradiation. A number of changes occur when tomato fruit progress from the mature-green to red-ripe stage of ripeness. The most obvious external changes of tomato fruit during ripening are associated with the loss of chlorophyll and the accumulation of lycopene ( Saltveit, 2005 ). The average initial Hunter L *, a * and b * values for fruit on their arrival to the laboratory (day 0) were 59, −19 and 32, respectively. However, during storage, untreated fruit lost their green colour much faster than UV-B treated fruit. As storage progressed, the lightness factor L * of tomato fruit generally decreased within the 37 d. However, UV-B treated fruit, except for the dose of 80 kJ/m 2 , were shinier (higher L * value) than untreated fruit, although the difference was not significant ( P > 0.05) (data not shown). The Hunter a */ b * ratio of the tomato fruit surface colour has been used as a reference parameter for red colour development in tomato fruit ( Arias et al., 2000 ). Between day 7 and 14, the means of a */ b * ratio of UV-B treated fruit were significantly lower ( P < 0.05) than untreated fruit except for 80 kJ/m 2 UV-B irradiation. However, after 37 d of storage, the a */ b * ratios of all UV-B irradiated fruit were higher than untreated fruit (data not shown). The results were similar to those reported by Aiamla-or et al. (2009, 2010) , who showed that UV-B doses of at least 8.8 kJ/m 2 significantly delayed broccoli floret yellowing and chlorophyll degradation. 3.2 Effect of UV-B irradiation on total phenolics and total flavonoids contents of tomato fruit during storage Phenolic compounds are important secondary metabolites in plants and the antioxidative activities of total phenolics in several plant extracts have been recently reported, suggesting possible protective roles of total phenolics in reducing risk of cardiovascular diseases in humans ( Velioglu et al., 1998 ). Total phenolics contents from untreated and UV-B treated fruit are shown in Table 2 . Both untreated and UV-B treated fruit showed an increasing trend in total phenolics content during the initial 21 d, then slightly decreased in the following seven days, and again increased towards the end of storage. From day 14 to 37, fruit irradiated with 20 or 40 kJ/m 2 demonstrated significantly higher levels of total phenolics when compared to the control ( P < 0.01) and slightly higher levels than other UV-B treatments (10 and 80 kJ/m 2 ). Similar results were obtained by Cantos et al. (2000) , who showed that refrigerated storage and UV-B irradiation of grapes can be beneficial in terms of increasing the content of potentially health-promoting phenolics. Flavonoids act in plants as antioxidants, antimicrobials, photoreceptors, visual attractors, feeding repellents, and light screening substances. As shown in Table 2 , untreated and UV-B treated fruit all showed an increasing trend in total flavonoids content during the whole storage period. Fruit irradiated with 20 or 40 kJ/m 2 had significantly higher ( P < 0.05) total flavonoids content when compared to the control and other UV-B treatments (10 and 80 kJ/m 2 ) from day 14 to 28. However, at the end of the storage period, the differences between untreated fruit and UV-B treated fruit were not significant ( P > 0.05). Our results are consistent with a study ( Hagen et al., 2007 ) which showed that postharvest irradiation with vis + UV-B enhanced the sum of flavonoids, sum of phenols and total phenols in the peel of shade-grown apples. 3.3 Effect of UV-B irradiation on lycopene content of tomato fruit during storage Lycopene, the red pigment of tomato fruit, on average constitutes about 80–90% of the total carotenoids content ( Shi and Le Maguer, 2000 ). Lycopene contents of untreated and UV-B treated fruit are presented in Table 3 . Lycopene content of untreated and UV-B treated fruit increased during storage. After 37 d of storage, the lycopene contents increased by about 40-fold when compared to initial levels. During the first 14 d, UV-B treatments, except the 80 kJ/m 2 UV-B treatment, were found to significantly reduce ( P < 0.01) lycopene content of fruit when compared to the control. However, after 21 d of storage, fruit irradiated with higher doses of UV-B (20, 40 and 80 kJ/m 2 ) had higher lycopene contents than untreated fruit. 3.4 Effect of UV-B irradiation on ascorbic acid content of tomato fruit during storage Little is known about the effects of UV-B irradiation on the retention of dietary antioxidants such as ascorbic acid in tomato fruit. Our results show that untreated and UV-B treated fruit all showed an increasing trend in ascorbic acid content during the whole storage period ( Table 4 ). However, UV-B irradiation had a negative effect on ascorbic acid content during storage. At the end of storage, the average ascorbic acid contents of UV-B treated fruit (8 mg/100 g FW) were about 18% lower than those of untreated fruit (9 mg/100 g FW). In contrast, Hagen et al. (2007) found that the content of ascorbic acid in the peel of apples increased after treatments with vis + UV-B. In this context, the effects of UV-B on ascorbic acid content have not yet been clearly elucidated and more studies on it are needed. 3.5 Effect of UV-B irradiation on antioxidant capacity of tomato fruit during storage Currently there is a multiplicity of methods used for antioxidant assays. Natural antioxidants are often multifunctional and the mechanism dominating in a particular test system depends on the composition of the system and the oxidation conditions, which affect both the capacity and kinetics of oxidation. Clearly, the influence of all relevant parameters cannot be evaluated by using only a one-dimensional assay protocol ( Frankel and Meyer, 2000 ). Therefore, three methods were used in this study to investigate the changes in total antioxidant capacity of tomato fruit during storage. Antioxidant capacity of tomato fruit as evaluated by FRAP, DPPH and AA are summarized in Table 5 . Untreated and UV-B treated fruit all showed an increasing trend in FRAP values during the first 21 d, after which 20, 40 and 80 kJ/m 2 UV-B treated fruit showed a slight decrease in the following seven days, and again increased toward the end of storage. Over the initial 21 d of storage, fruit irradiated with 20, 40 or 80 kJ/m 2 increased their FRAP values when compared to untreated and 10 kJ/m 2 UV-B treated fruit. However, at the end of storage, untreated fruit showed the highest FRAP value (11 mM/100 g), but no significant difference ( P > 0.05) between untreated and UV-B treated fruit were found. Changes during storage in the percentage of DPPH radical inhibition by antioxidants in tomato fruit are shown in Table 5 . Similar to FRAP, both untreated and UV-B treated fruit showed an increasing trend during the initial 21 d of storage, then slightly decreased over the following seven days, and again increased. Between day 7 and 28, 20 and 40 kJ/m 2 UV-B irradiated fruit had higher DPPH values compared to untreated fruit ( P < 0.05). After 37 d of storage, all UV-B treatments increased DPPH values, and 20 kJ/m 2 UV-B treated fruit had the highest DPPH (41%) which was about 15% higher than untreated fruit ( P < 0.05). In this study, AA remained constant in all treatments during the 28 d post-irradiation period, and then increased sharply in the following seven days. Within the whole storage period, 40 kJ/m 2 UV-B treated fruit had higher AA than untreated and other UV-B treated fruit and had the highest AA (86%) after 37 d storage, followed by 20 kJ/m 2 UV-B irradiation (85%). At the end of storage, UV-B irradiations (20 and 40 kJ/m 2 ) significantly increased ( P < 0.05) AA as compared to the control. The above analysis clearly shows that postharvest UV-B treatment could increase the antioxidant capacity of tomato fruit. Previous studies have shown that soluble antioxidant activity contributes >92% of the total antioxidant activity of tomatoes, while the lipophilic antioxidants, mainly lycopene and lipophilic phenolics, contribute only about 8% ( Toor and Savage, 2005 ). In this study, an increase in the levels of total phenolics and total flavonoids occurred in UV-B treated fruit and their possible synergistic interactions may have been responsible for the observed increase in the water-soluble antioxidant capacity (expressed as FRAP and DPPH), even when ascorbic acid content was reduced by the UV-B irradiation. On the other hand, an increase in the level of lycopene that occurred in UV-B treated fruit at the end of storage may be responsible for the increase in the liposoluble antioxidant capacity (expressed as AA). In summary, UV-B irradiation had a positive effect on antioxidant capacity. The result is in agreement with Hagen et al. (2007) , who found that the antioxidant capacity increased significantly in the peel of both sun-exposed and shade-grown apples after irradiation with vis + UV-B. 4 Conclusion It can be concluded from this study that 20 or 40 kJ/m 2 postharvest UV-B irradiation was most effective in maintaining a high level of firmness and delaying colour development. Furthermore, 20 or 40 kJ/m 2 postharvest UV-B irradiation promoted the accumulation of total phenolics and total flavonoids, resulting in higher antioxidant capacity during storage. However, UV-B irradiation had a negative effect on ascorbic acid content during storage. 10 kJ/m 2 UV-B irradiation was also beneficial with regard to sensory qualities and antioxidant capacity, but to a lesser extent. At the highest dose, 80 kJ/m 2 resulted in higher lycopene content, but showed negative effects on texture, colour, and antioxidants. In summary, postharvest UV-B irradiation at intermediate doses had positive effects on sensory quality and antioxidant capacity of tomato fruit. Acknowledgement This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 30972036 ). References Aiamla-or et al., 2010 S. Aiamla-or S. Kaewsuksaeng M. Shigyo N. Yamauchi Impact of UV-B irradiation on chlorophyll degradation and chlorophyll-degrading enzyme activities in stored broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. Italica Group) florets Food Chem. 120 2010 645 651 Aiamla-or et al., 2009 S. Aiamla-or N. Yamauchi S. Takino M. Shigyo Effect of UV-A and UV-B irradiation on broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. Italica Group) floret yellowing during storage Postharvest Biol. Technol. 54 2009 177 179 Alothman et al., 2009 M. Alothman R. Bhat A.A. Karim UV radiation-induced changes of antioxidant capacity of fresh-cut tropical fruits Innovat. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 10 2009 512 516 Arias et al., 2000 R. Arias T.C. Lee L. Logendra H. Janes Correlation of lycopene measured by HPLC with the L *, a *, b * color readings of a hydroponic tomato and the relationship of maturity with color and lycopene content J. Agric. Food Chem. 48 2000 1697 1702 Ayala-Zavala et al., 2004 F.J. Ayala-Zavala S.Y. Wang C.Y. Wang G.A. Gonzalez-Aguilar Effect of storage temperatures on antioxidants capacity and aroma compounds in strawberry fruit LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 37 2004 687 695 Barka et al., 2000 E.A. Barka S. Kalatari J. Makhlouf J. Arul Impact of UV-C irradiation on the cell wall-degrading enzymes during ripening of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L.) fruit J. Agric. Food Chem. 48 2000 667 671 Cantos et al., 2000 E. Cantos C. García-Viguera S. Pascual-Tersa F.A. Tomás-Barberán Effect of postharvest ultraviolet irradiation on resveratrol and other phenolics of Cv. Napoleon table grapes J. Agric. Food Chem. 48 2000 4606 4612 Costa et al., 2002 H. Costa S.M. Gallego M. Tomaro Effect of UV-B radiation on antioxidant defense system in sunflower cotyledon Plant Sci. 162 2002 939 945 Franceschi et al., 1994 S. Franceschi E. Bidoli C. La Vecchia R. Talamini B. D’Avanzo E. Negri Tomatoes and risk of digestive-tract cancers Int. J. Cancer 59 1994 181 184 Frankel and Meyer, 2000 E.N. Frankel A.S. Meyer The problems of using one-dimensional methods to evaluate multifunctional food and biological antioxidants J. Sci. Food Agric. 80 2000 1925 1941 Gerster, 1997 H. Gerster The potential role of lycopene for human health J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 16 1997 109 126 Hagen et al., 2007 S.F.A. Hagen G.I.B. Borge G. Bengtsson W. Bilger A. Berge K. Haffner K.A. Solhaug Phenolic contents and other health and sensory related properties of apple fruit ( Malus domestica Borkh., cv. Aroma): effect of postharvest UV-B irradiation Postharvest Biol. Technol. 45 2007 1 10 Jagadeesh et al., 2009 S.L. Jagadeesh M.T. Charles Y. Gariepy B. Goyette G.S.V. Raghavan C. Vigneault Influence of postharvest UV-C hormesis on the bioactive components of tomato during post-treatment handling Food Bioprocess Technol. 2009 doi:10.1007/s11947-009-0259-y Kaur and Kapoor, 2002 C. Kaur H.C. Kapoor Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of some Asian vegetables Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 37 2002 153 161 Ko et al., 2008 J.A. Ko B.H. Lee J.S. Lee H.J. Park Effect of UV-B exposure on the concentration of vitamin D2 in sliced shiitake mushroom ( Lentinus edodes ) and white button mushroom ( Agaricus bisporus ) J. Agric. Food Chem. 56 2008 3671 3674 Lenucci et al., 2006 M.S. Lenucci D. Cadinu M. Taurino G. Piro G. Dalessandro Antioxidant composition in cherry and high-pigment tomato cultivars J. Agric. Food Chem. 54 2006 2606 2613 Leonardi et al., 2000 C. Leonardi P. Ambrosino F. Esposito V. Fogliano Antioxidant activity and carotenoid and tomatine contents in different typologies of fresh consumption tomatoes J. Agric. Food Chem. 48 2000 4723 4727 Leshem et al., 1986 Y.Y. Leshem A.H. Halevy C. Frenkel Processes and Control of Plant Senescence 1986 Elsevier Amsterdam Li and Zou, 2009 S.Z. Li Z.R. Zou The optical property research and analysis of new film cladding material Res. Agric. Mech. 7 2009 185 188 Liu et al., 2009 L.H. Liu D. Zabaras L.E. Bennett P. Aguas B.W. Woonton Effects of UV-C, red light and sun light on the carotenoid content and physical qualities of tomatoes during post-harvest storage Food Chem. 115 2009 495 500 Maharaj et al., 1999 R. Maharaj J. Arul P. Nadeau Effect of photochemical treatment in the preservation of fresh tomato ( Lycopersicon esculetum cv Capello) by delaying senescence Postharvest Biol. Technol. 15 1999 13 23 Mau et al., 1998 J.-L. Mau P.-R. Chen J.-H. Yang Ultraviolet irradiation increased vitamin D2 content in edible mushrooms J. Agric. Food Chem. 46 1998 5269 5272 Odriozola-Serrano et al., 2008 I. Odriozola-Serrano R. Soliva-Fortuny O. Martín-Belloso Antioxidant properties and shelf-life extension of fresh-cut tomatoes stored at different temperatures J. Sci. Food Agric. 88 2008 2606 2614 Roberts et al., 2008 J.S. Roberts A. Teichert T.H. McHugh Vitamin D2 formation from post-harvest UV-B treatment of mushrooms ( Agaricus bisporus ) and retention during storage Food Chem. 56 2008 4541 4544 Saltveit, 2005 M.E. Saltveit Fruit ripening fruit quality E. Heuvelink Tomatoes 2005 CAB International Wallingford, UK 145 170 Scalzo et al., 2005 J. Scalzo A. Politi N. Pellegrini B. Mezzetti M. Battino Plant genotype affects total antioxidant capacity and phenolic contents in fruit Nutrition 21 2005 207 Schreiner et al., 2009 M. Schreiner A. Krumbein I. Mewis C. Ulrichs S. Huyskens-Keil Short-term and moderate UV-B radiation effects on secondary plant metabolism in different organs of nasturtium ( Tropaeolum majus L.) Innovat. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 10 2009 93 96 Shi and Le Maguer, 2000 J. Shi M. Le Maguer Lycopene in tomatoes: chemical and physical properties affected by food processing CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 110 2000 1 42 Stewart et al., 2000 A.J. Stewart S. Bozonnet W. Mullen G.I. Jenkins M.E.J. Lean A. Crozier Occurrence of flavonols in tomatoes and tomato-based products J. Agric. Food Chem. 48 2000 2663 2669 Tijskens and Evelo, 1994 L.M.M. Tijskens R.W. Evelo Modelling colour of tomatoes during postharvest storage Postharvest Biol. Technol. 4 1994 85 89 Toor and Savage, 2005 R.K. Toor G.P. Savage Antioxidant activity in different fractions of tomatoes Food Res. Int. 38 2005 487 494 Velioglu et al., 1998 Y.S. Velioglu X. Mazza L. Gao B.D. Oomah Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables and grain products J. Agric. Food Chem. 46 1998 4113 4117 Xu et al., 2008 C. Xu S. Natarajan J.H. Sullivan Impact of solar ultraviolet-B radiation on the antioxidant defense system in soybean lines differing in flavonoid contents Environ. Exp. Bot. 63 2008 39 48