Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary arterial bypass grafting in patients with left main coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
I Gialamas,K Kalogeras,P Pantelidis,A Lysandrou,G Zakynthinos,T Lytra,M Gounaridi,O Katsarou,A Roubelakis,E Oikonomou,G Siasos,M Vavouranakis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2369
IF: 39.3
2024-10-30
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Background Left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD), defined as a stenosis of >50%, is a potentially lethal condition that should be treated intensively by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) depending on the anatomy. The presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) complicates LMCAD, acting as a potential worsening factor for this group of patients, as well as impairing the effectiveness and outcomes of both revascularization treatments. Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to comprehensively compare the outcomes of PCI and CABG in patients with LMCAD and CKD. Methods A systematic search of the available literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL. Studies that compared PCI versus CABG in patients with LMCAD and CKD were included. The primary endpoints comprised major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause death, while secondary endpoints included components of MACCE, such as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and new revascularization events. The results were qualitatively and quantitatively synthesized and pooled hazard ratios (HR) were calculated. The statistical analysis was conducted in R. Results A total of 767 titles were initially retrieved, with five studies finally included in the analysis (n = 2,337 patients). The pooled analysis revealed that patients treated with PCI experienced more MACCE (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.26-1.78, p < 0.001), an outcome primarily driven by MI (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.17-2.62, p = 0.01) and revascularization rates (Hazard Ratio: 3.66, 95% CI: 1.84-7.30, p < 0.001), while no significant difference was shown in stroke rates (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.40-1.22, p = 0.21). A trend towards increased all-cause death was observed for the PCI group, although this outcome slightly failed to reach statistical significance (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.00-1.68, p = 0.05). Conclusion The present systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that PCI appears inferior to CABG in patients with LMCAD and CKD, with respect to most long-term outcomes. This includes higher rates of MACCE, and particularly MI and new events of revascularization for patients undergoing PCI, while all-cause death was marginally higher for this group. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to provide more robust evidence for guiding revascularization strategies in this high-risk population.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems