Comparative study of salvage liver transplantation and primary liver transplantation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

ZHANG Tong,FU Bin-sheng,MENG Wei,YANG Yang,CAI Chang-jie,LU Min-qiang,CHEN Gui-hua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2010.22.017
2010-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To probe the clinical value of salvage liver transplantation(SLT) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.METHODS:The clinical and follow-up data of 183 patients underwent SLT for HCC were analyzed retrospectively.Two Group were divided:salvage liver transplantation group(n=19) and primary liver transplantation(PLT) group(n=42).Their accumulative survival rates,disease free survival rates were analyzed by Kaplan-Merier method and Log-rank tests were performed.RESULTS:There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of anhepatic phase,overall ischaemic time,blood loss,packed red blood cell transfusion(RBC),fresh frozen plasma transfusion(FFP),complication of transplanted liver,retransplantation rate,perioperative mortality rate,tumors recurrence rate between PLT groups and SLT groups(P0.05).While there was statistical difference in terms of operative time(P0.05).The 1,3,5-year accumulative survival rates were 100.0%,84.2%,84.2% and 100.0%,82.5%,79.0%(χ2=0.202,P=0.653),and the 1,3,5-year disease-free survival rates were 100.0%,88.8%,88.8% and 97.3%,97.3%,97.3%(χ2=1.114,P=0.291)between SLT group and PLT group.There were no statistic significance difference between two groups(P0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Salvage liver transplantation strategy still remain satisfactory effective in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.When the indication for salvage liver transplantation is strictly controlled,the same curative effect can be acquired as primary liver transplantation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?