[Cardioprotective Effect and Mechanism of Post-Infarction Ventricular Remodeling after Self-Assembling Peptide and Thermosensitive Hydrogel Implantation in Rat Myocardial Infarction Model].

Tao Wang,Tao Lin,Shan Ren,Ming-Jie Yuan,Xiao-Yan Li,Xue-Jun Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2010.04.014
2010-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the cardioprotective effect of self-assembling peptide (RAD16-II) and thermosensitive hydrogel DPHP (Dex-PCL-HEMA/PNIPAAm) and investigate the optimal property of hydrogel for the treatment of myocardial infarction (MI).METHODS:MI model was induced by left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery ligation in SD rats. The animals were randomized into three groups to receive RAD16-II hydrogel (n = 15), DPHP hydrogel (n = 15) or PBS (phosphate buffered saline; control group n = 15); sham-operated rats (n = 10), a suture was tied loosely around left coronary artery without ligating it. At Day 20 post-MI, left ventricle function was evaluated by echocardiography and cardiac catheter. Masson's trichrome was used for histological examination; anti-alpha-smooth muscle antigen (alpha-SMA) was applied to label the neovasculature formation in infarct area.RESULTS:The rats receiving DPHP hydrogel showed a significantly smaller left ventricle end diastolic diameter (LVEDd) and higher levels of left ventricle fraction shortening (LVFS) and left ventricle end systolic pressure (LVESP) than the rats in RAD16-II group [LVEDd (7.9 +/- 0.9) mm vs (8.9 +/- 0.8) mm]; [LVFS (25.4 +/- 5.1)% vs (21.9 +/- 2.9)%; LVESP (114.0 +/- 7.6) mm Hg vs (99.1 +/- 9.6) mm Hg; P < 0.05]. Histological examination showed uncompleted degraded hydrogel in infarct area of DPHP group but not in RAD16-II group. The animals receiving DPHP hydrogel demonstrated significantly a smaller infarct size, a higher infarct wall thickness and a lower vessel density in infarct than the animals receiving RAD16-II hydrogel (P < 0.05).CONCLUSION:DPHP hydrogel implantation further inhibits the post-MI ventricle remodeling than RAD16-II hydrogel implantation. The mechanism is not correlated with the vascular density in infarct area.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?