[Clinical Implication of Stone Culture in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy].

Kai Ma,Qing-Quan Xu,Xiao-Bo Huang,Xiao-Feng Wang,Jian-Xing Li,Liu-Lin Xiong,Bo Yang,Xiong-Jun Ye,Yan-Qun Na
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2010.04.003
2010-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the correlation between stone culture and SIRS, ascertain the clinical implication of stone culture in PCNL.METHODS:Clinical data of 66 patients who underwent PCNL in our department were analyzed retrospectively. Eight risk factors including stone culture + drug sensitivity, urine culture + drug sensitivity, age, gender, prophylactic antibiotics, stone volume, operative time and the number of tract. Multiple statistics methods were used for analysis to evaluate the impact of SIRS, and compare the difference between stone culture and urine culture.RESULTS:Univariate analysis and Multivariate logistic regression model showed that positive stone culture was the risk factor of SIRS (P < 0.05). Positive stone culture was found in 48.48% patients, which was higher than that of urine culture (30.30%). Fourteen patients (66.67%) of 21 postoperative SIRS patients were prescribed antibiotics according to the stone culture result. And all of them recovered unevenly without developing septic shock or MODS.CONCLUSIONS:Positive stone culture is the important risk factor of post-PCNL SIRS. Stone culture is better than urine culture in directing postoperative antibiotics prescripsion and should be routinely used.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?