Abstract:Background: Predicting B-cell epitopes is important for understanding disease pathogenesis, identifying potential autoantigens, and designing vaccines and immune-based cancer therapies. The experimental approaches used for detecting B-cell epitopes are often laborious and resource-intensive. Thus, several computational methods have been developed for predicting the epitopes of a given antigen. However, most of these methods are coarse binary classifications of antigen regions within epitopes or non-epitopes and do not specify antibodies. Therefore, we aim to solve this antibody-specified epitope prediction problem using a developed structure-based computational machine-learning method, Epitopia, to reflect this biological reality accurately. Result: We selected 60 non-redundant antibody-antigen protein complexes to train and applied the leave-one-out cross-validation method to test the accuracy of our proposed methods; we compared the results with the Epitopia, Discotope 2.0,PEASE and the state-of-the-art tool SEPPA 2.0. We considered the role of both complementarity determining region residues and antigen surface residues in antigen-antibody interactions and assigned a score for each antigen surface residue. If we considered a prediction to be successful if the average score of "epitope residues" exceeded the average score over all surface residues. Then the success rates of our proposed methods were all higher than Epitopia and the best one was 83.3%, which is 7% higher than the rate obtained with Epitopia (76%). The results show that antibody-specific methods are competitive with, and sometimes even better than, Epitopia, which only considers the antigen residues. Conclusion: Our antibody-specific methods provide sufficient accuracy in locating epitopes because whether an antigen surface residue is an epitope depends on whether the antibody recognizes it. This approach is a new method for identifying B-cell epitopes. Based on our results, we believe that the prediction of antibody-specific B cell epitopes is more meaningful and efficient than those which are only considering antigen residues.

Prediction of B cell epitopes of tumor-associated protein EIF4G1 subtypes

Prediction of B Cell Epitopes of Tumor-Associated Protein EIF4G1 Subtypes

Prediction of the Common B Cell Epitopes Derived from the Tumor Antigen MAGE-A Sub-Family

Bioinformatics Prediction of AgB1 Antigen Epitopes of Echinococcus granulosus

Prediction and identification of B‑cell epitopes for tumor necrosis factor‑α.

Prediction of B cell epitopes and HLA restricted CTL epitopes of human cervical cancer oncogene protein

Bioinformatic prediction of epitopes in the TSP3 antigen of Echinococcus multiloculqris

Predicting B Cell Epitopes of ECSM2 Extracellular Domain with Bioinformatics

Predicting Immunogenic T-cell Epitopes by Combining Various Sequence-Derived Features.

Prediction of B-cell epitopes on human ovarian cancer-associated antigen OVA66

Bioinformatic prediction of epitopes in the Emy162 antigen of Echinococcus multilocularis.

Prediction and identification of B-lymphocyte epitopes derived from Ewing's sarcoma EWS-FLI1 fusion protein

Compare the Difference of B-cell Epitopes of EgAgB1 and EgAgB3 Proteins Selected Through Bioinformatic Analysis

Prediction and Identification of B Cell Epitopes Derived from EWS/FLI-l Fusion Protein of Ewing’s Sarcoma

[Prediction of B cell epitopes of human papillomavirus type 16 L1 protein].

Bioinformatics prediction on glutathione S-transferase antigen epitopes of Echinoccocus granulosus

Using a Machine-Learning Approach to Predict Discontinuous Antibody-Specific B-Cell Epitopes

B-cell Epitopes Prediction of the Protein Expressed by Human Cytomegalovirus Genen UL23 Open Reading Frame

Databases for B-cell Epitopes.

Prediction of T Cell and B Cell Epitopes of the 22-, 47-, 56-, and 58-Kda Proteins of Orientia Tsutsugamushi

Bioinformatics Resources and Tools for Conformational B-Cell Epitope Prediction