Mitigation and controlling technology of methane from refuse landfills

Youcai Zhao,Dan Han,Tiantao Zhao,Li Wang,Xiaoli Chai
2010-01-01
Abstract:Methane mitigation and controlling technology, including bio-cover, bio-inhibition and oxidation by virtue of cowl, were introduced in the work. The methane oxidation capacity of modified aged refuse (the mixture of aged refuse (AR) with aged sludge (AS)/fresh sludge (FS)/nitrate minimal salt (NMS)) was investigated as bio-cover for methane mitigation in landfills. 0.4 mL NMS/10 g AR was the optional modified material for methane oxidation, with nearly 100 % of methane conversion rate during one week. Chloroform and acetylene were taken as bio-inhibitor and could effectively inhibit methanogens. A central composite design (CCD) and response surface regression analysis (RSREG) were employed to determine the optimum conditions and interaction effects of chloroform and acetylene in terms of methane. Acetylene promoted the inhibition efficiency (F = 31.14; p < 0.01) more effectively than chloroform (F = 2.46; p > 0.05). Compared with single factor experiments, the inhibition efficiencies were 35.82% and 87.60%, respectively, as the concentrations of chloroform and acetylene were 5 mg/kg and 3×10-3(v/v), while the co-inhibition efficiency was 92.40%. Additionally, it was found cowl was potential to reduce methane to a low level without any energy in landfills. Utilizing the bio-cover, bio-inhibition and cowl in the demonstration engineering, the results in the three months showed that methane concentration in the demonstration unit was decreased to below 10%, about 1/3-1/4 of the blank unit, thus an obvious effect of methane mitigation in refuse landfills was achieved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?