Cellular response to ZnO nanoparticle toxicity inferred from global gene expression profilescellular response to ZnO nanoparticle toxicity inferred from global gene expression profiles

Nobutaka Hanagata,Mingsheng Xu,Taro Takemura,Fei Zhuang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11344/nano.2.153
2010-01-01
Nanobiomedicine
Abstract:We compared cytotoxicities of metal oxide nanomaterials, including different sizes (20 and 60 nm) of ZnO nanoparticles (NPs), Al-doped ZnO-NPs, Al 2O 3-NPs, Al 2O 3 nanowhiskers (NWs) and SiO 2-NPs, on the basis of viabilities of human lung epithelial A549 cells exposed to these nanoma- terials. Al 2O 3-NPs, Al 2O 3-NWs and SiO 2-NPs showed no significant cytotoxic effects on viability. On the other hand, ZnO-NPs, which included ZnO-NPs (20 nm), ZnO-NPs (60 nm), and Al-doped ZnO-NPs, all showed toxic effects; however, no significant differences in cytotoxicity were observed among these ZnO-NPs, suggesting that nanoparticle size and Al-doping do not contribute to cytotoxicity. Global gene expression analysis using a DNA microarray revealed that 22 and 8 genes were consistently up and down-regulated, respectively, in cells exposed to the 3 ZnO-NPs. Our results suggest that up-regulation of genes by ZnO-NPs leads to maintenance of zinc homeostasis and protection against oxidative stress, while down-regulation of genes causes disruption of zinc homeostasis, DNA damage, and apoptosis. The balance between protective mechanisms induced by up-regulated genes and cellular damages induced by down-regulated genes may determine the fate of cells.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?