Abstract:Classical logic is not adequate to face the essential vagueness of human reasoning, which is approximate rather than precise in nature. The logical treatment of the concepts of vagueness and approximation is of increasing importance in artificial intelligence and related research. Consequently, many logicians have proposed different systems of many-valued logic as a formalization of approximate reasoning (see, for example, Goguen [G], Gerla and Tortora [GT], Novak [No], Pavelka [P], and Takeuti and Titani [TT]). As far as we know, all the proposals are obtained by extending the range of truth values of propositions. In these logical systems reasoning is still exact and to make a conclusion the antecedent clause of its rule must match its premise exactly. In addition. Wang [W] pointed out: “If we compare calculation with proving,... Procedures of calculation... can be made so by fairly well-developed methods of approximation; whereas... we do not have a clear conception of approximate methods in theorem proving.... The concept of approximate proofs, though undeniably of another kind than approximations in numerical calculations, is not incapable of more exact formulation in terms of, say, sketches of and gradual improvements toward a correct proof” (see pp, 224–225). As far as the author is aware, however, no attempts have been made to give a conception of approximate methods in theorem proving. The purpose of this paper is. unlike all the previous proposals, to develop a propositional calculus, a predicate calculus in which the truth values of propositions are still true or false exactly and in which the reasoning may be approximate and allow the antecedent clause of a rule to match its premise only approximately. In a forthcoming paper we shall establish set theory, based on the logic introduced here, in which there are ∣ L ∣ binary predicates ∈ λ , λ ∈ L such that R (∈, ∈ λ ) = λ where ∈ stands for ∈ 1 and 1 is the greatest element in L , and x ∈ λ y is interpreted as that x belongs to y in the degree of λ , and relate it to intuitionistic fuzzy set theory of Takeuti and Titani [TT] and intuitionistic modal set theory of Lano [ L ]. In another forthcoming paper we shall introduce the resolution principle under approximate match and illustrate its applications in production systems of artificial intelligence.

Pointer Logic Dealing with Uncertain Equality of Pointers

A Pointer Logic for Object Diagrams

Scope Logic: An Extension to Hoare Logic for Pointers and Recursive Data Structures

Scope Logic: Extending Hoare Logic for Pointer Program Verification

Precise Complexity Guarantees for Pointer Analysis via Datalog with Extensions

Probabilistic pointer analysis for multithreaded programs

SECURITY IMPROVEMENT OF POINTER ANALYSIS ALGORITHM BASED ON SOURCE CODE

Ownership Types for Verification of Programs with Pointer Arithmetic

A Shape System and Loop Invariant Inference

Necessity and Capability of Flow, Context, Field and Quasi Path Sensitive Points-to Analysis

A program logic for union bounds

Scope Logic with Local Reasoning and Pre/Post-State Properties

Deciding Separation Logic with Pointer Arithmetic and Inductive Definitions

Unification-based Pointer Analysis without Oversharing

Exploiting Pointer Analysis in Memory Models for Deductive Verification

Safe Pointers in SPARK 2014

Uncertain Logic

Making Pointer Analysis More Precise by Unleashing the Power of Selective Context Sensitivity.

Program Optimization Based Pointer Analysis and Live Stack-Heap Analysis

A logic for approximate reasoning

Pointer life cycle types for lock-free data structures with memory reclamation