Abstract:The field of algorithmic self-assembly is concerned with the computational and expressive power of nanoscale self-assembling molecular systems. In the well-studied cooperative, or temperature 2, abstract tile assembly model it is known that there is a tile set to simulate any Turing machine and an intrinsically universal tile set that simulates the shapes and dynamics of any instance of the model, up to spatial rescaling. It has been an open question as to whether the seemingly simpler noncooperative, or temperature 1, model is capable of such behaviour. Here we show that this is not the case, by showing that there is no tile set in the noncooperative model that is intrinsically universal, nor one capable of time-bounded Turing machine simulation within a bounded region of the plane. Although the noncooperative model intuitively seems to lack the complexity and power of the cooperative model it was not obvious how to prove this. One reason is that there have been few tools to analyse the structure of complicated paths in the plane. This paper provides a number of such tools. A second reason is that almost every obvious and small generalisation to the model (e.g. allowing error, 3D, non-square tiles, signals/wires on tiles, tiles that repel each other, parallel synchronous growth) endows it with great computational, and sometimes simulation, power. Our main results show that all of these generalisations provably increase computational and/or simulation power. Our results hold for both deterministic and nondeterministic noncooperative systems. Our first main result stands in stark contrast with the fact that for both the cooperative tile assembly model, and for 3D noncooperative tile assembly, there are respective intrinsically universal tilesets. Our second main result gives a new technique (reduction to simulation) for proving negative results about computation in tile assembly.

Factoring Integers in the Tile Assembly Model

Integer Factorization Based on the Tile Assembly Model

Solving Vertex Cover Problem Using DNA Tile Assembly Model

Prime factorization via localized tile assembly in a DNA origami framework

One-Time-Pads Encryption in the Tile Assembly Model

Multiplier System in the Tile Assembly Model with Reduced Tileset-Size.

Triangular Self-Assembly

Deterministic Algorithm For The Reordering Problem Using Tile Assembly

Algorithm of Solving the Subset-Product Problem Based on Dna Tile Self-Assembly

Breaking DES in tile assembly models

Sequential non-determinism in tile self-assembly: a general framework and an application to efficient temperature-1 self-assembly of squares

The non-cooperative tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal or capable of bounded Turing machine simulation

Modular Arithmetic Expressions and Primality Testing via DNA Self-Assembly

Computing Real Numbers using DNA Self-Assembly

Solving The 0-1 Multi-Objective Knapsack Problem Using Self-Assembly Of Dna Tiles

The Coven-Meyerowitz tiling conditions for 3 prime factors: the even case

Solving 0-1 Planning Problem Based on Self-Assembly of DNA Tiles

Deterministic Molecular Assembly with a Finite Set of Building Blocks: Universal Assembly Kits for Backbone-Assisted and Sequence-Directed Abstract Tile Assembly Models

DNA Algorithm for Factoring Integers Based on the Pollard P-1 Method

One Tile to Rule Them All: Simulating Any Turing Machine, Tile Assembly System, or Tiling System with a Single Puzzle Piece

Breaking the RSA Public Key Cryptosystem Using Self-Assembly of DNA Tilings