Adiabatic and Nonadiabatic State-to-State Quantum Dynamics for O ( 1 D )
Shi Ying Lin,Hua Guo
2009-01-01
Abstract:ion mechanism on this excited state. These observations are consistent with earlier theoretical studies of the title reaction based on the QCT approach.51,54,56 It is interesting to note that the DCSs of these two A′ pathways are very sensitive to the collision energy, whereas that of the A′′ pathway is a smooth function of Ec. To quantify the contributions of the three reaction pathways, we plot in Figure 10 the total DCS in three collision energies with the individual contributions. At the lowest collision energy (0.056 eV), contributions from the excited-state pathways are minimal and the DCS is almost solely from the ground state 11A′ pathway. Because of its complex-forming nature, the DCS is clearly forward-backward symmetric. In the same figure, the experimental DCS25,41 is also included. The overall agreement between the calculated and measured DCSs is reasonable, although the sharp peaks at the extremal angles of the calculated angular distribution are absent from the experimental data. This is likely due to the limitations in the experimental resolution.29 There are also some oscillations in the calculated DCS, presumably stemming from quantum interference. Oscillations are commonly seen in quantum mechanical DCSs39 but absent in those obtained by QCT calculations.41,54,56 At higher collision energies (0.10 and 0.15 eV), contributions of the excited-state pathways to the total DCS become increasingly important. While the nonadiabatic 21A′ pathway generally raises the DCS at all scattering angles, it does not change the polarity of the angular distribution. On the other hand, the adiabatic 11A′′ pathway increases the bias toward the backward scattering direction, due apparently to its abstraction mechanism. The bias increases with the collision energy, stemming from the increasing weight of the adiabatic 11A′′ pathway. This observation is in good accord with the experimental observations22 and previous QCT results on this reaction,51,54,56 thus confirming the interpretation that the observed backward propensity is due to the participation of the excited-state abstraction pathway.45,47,48 Figure 7. Comparison of the calculated and measured OH rotational state distributions at the collision energy of 0.056 eV. The experimental data25,41 have been normalized to the calculated distributions. Figure 8. Calculated product rotational state distributions at 0.10 and 0.15 eV of collision energies. State-to-State Quantum Dynamics J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 113, No. 16, 2009 4291