A Single Amino Acid Change in Ca V 1.2 Channels Eliminates the Permeation and Gating Differences Between Ca 2+ and Ba 2+

Zhe Li,Xianming Wang,Guofeng Gao,Dongmei Qu,Buwei Yu,Congxin Huang,Keith S. Elmslie,Blaise Z. Peterson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-009-9221-1
2010-01-01
Abstract:Glutamate scanning mutagenesis was used to assess the role of the calcicludine binding segment in regulating channel permeation and gating using both Ca(2+) and Ba(2+) as charge carriers. As expected, wild-type Ca(V)1.2 channels had a Ba(2+) conductance ~2x that in Ca(2+) (G(Ba)/G(Ca) = 2) and activation was ~10 mV more positive in Ca(2+) vs. Ba(2+). Of the 11 mutants tested, F1126E was the only one that showed unique permeation and gating properties compared to the wild type. F1126E equalized the Ca(V)1.2 channel conductance (G(Ba)/G(Ca) = 1) and activation voltage dependence between Ca(2+) and Ba(2+). Ba(2+) permeation was reduced because the interactions among multiple Ba(2+) ions and the pore were specifically altered for F1126E, which resulted in Ca(2+)-like ionic conductance and unitary current. However, the high-affinity block of monovalent cation flux was not altered for either Ca(2+) or Ba(2+). The half-activation voltage of F1126E in Ba(2+) was depolarized to match that in Ca(2+), which was unchanged from that in the wild type. As a result, the voltages for half-activation and half-inactivation of F1126E in Ba(2+) and Ca(2+) were similar to those of wild-type in Ca(2+). This effect was specific to F1126E since F1126A did not affect the half-activation voltage in either Ca(2+) or Ba(2+). These results indicate that residues in the outer vestibule of the Ca(V)1.2 channel pore are major determinants of channel gating, selectivity, and permeation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?