Analyzing Land Use Change and Its Driving Forces in SXC Region over the Past 20 Years
ZHANG Jian,CHEN Feng,PU Li-jie,HAN Shu-cheng,YE Hao,PENG Bu-zhuo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2007.04.010
2007-01-01
Abstract:Land use is an important component of global environmental change research.With its dense population and developed economy,SXC region has a long history of land use.Since 1980,great changes have taken place in society and economy in SXC region,which cause the corresponding land use change.The land use change is driven by both nature and human in SXC region.Compare with the economic policy,nature factor is stable.It is clarified that the social and economic policy factors are the main driving forces of cultivated land change.Through statistics and computation analysis of the Landsat TM data of 1980,1995 and 2000, we can conclude that: 1)GDP(x_1),the volume of investment in fixed assets(x_2),the tertiary industry rate(x_4),the agricultural production value(x_5),the forestry production value(x_6),the fishery production value(x_7),the population(x_8) and the urbanization rate(x_9) are in negative correlation with the area proportion of paddy field.The industrialized rate(x_3) is in positive correlation with the area proportion of paddy field.GDP(x_1),the volume of investment in fixed assets(x_2), the industrialized rate(x_3) and the population(x_8) are in negative correlation with the area proportion of dry-land.The forestry production value(x_6) and the urbanization rate(x_8) are in positive correlation with the area proportion of dry-land;2)GDP(x_1),the volume of investment in fixed assets(x_2),the agricultural production value(x_5),the forestry production value(x_6) and the population(x_8) are in positive correlation with the area proportion of forestland.The industrialized rate(x_3) is in negative correlation with the area proportion of forestland;3)GDP(x_1),the volume of investment in fixed assets(x_2),the industrialized rate(x_3),the tertiary industry rate(x_4),the year end population(x_8) and the fishery production value(x_7) are in negative correlation with the area proportion of urbanization land.GDP(x_1),the volume of investment in fixed assets(x_2),the tertiary industry rate(x_4),the agricultural production value(x_5),the forestry production value(x_6),the fishery production value(x_7),the population(x_8),the urbanization rate(x_9) are in negative correlation with the area proportion of rural residential land.GDP(x_1),the volume of investment in fixed assets(x_2),the industrialized rate(x_3),the forestry production value(x_6),the fishery production value(x_7),the population(x_8) and the urbanization rate(x_9) are in positive correlation with the area proportion of other construction land;4) GDP(x_1),the volume of investment in fixed assets(x_2),the tertiary industry rate(x_4),the forestry production value(x_6) are in positive correlation with the area proportion of water.The agricultural production value(x_5),the fishery production value(x_7),the urbanization rate(x_9) are in negative correlation with the area proportion of water. GDP(x_1),the volume of investment in fixed assets(x_2),the industrialized rate(x_3),the tertiary industry rate(x_4),the fishery production value(x_7),the population(x_8),the urbanization rate(x_9) are in negative correlation with the area proportion of virgin soil.