Abstract:In this study, an expert knowledge-based model, a logistic regression model, and an artificial neural network model were compared for their accuracy and portability in landslide susceptibility mapping. Two study areas (the Kaixian and the Three Gorges areas in China) were selected for this comparison based on their well-known, high landslide hazard. To evaluate the performance of these models and to minimize the impact of the particularity of a study area on model performance, cross-applications of three models between the two study areas were conducted. When the Kaixian area was used as a model development area, prediction accuracy for the expert knowledge-based model, the logistic regression model, and the artificial neural network model were 71.5%, 81.0% and 100.0%, respectively. The high prediction accuracy of the two data-driven models were expected because the observed landslide occurrence used in training the models were also used to validate their respective performance, while the expert knowledge-based model did not use these observations for training. The perfect accuracy for the neural network model can also be attributed to its over-prediction of the susceptibility. When breaking the susceptibility into four classes: very low susceptibility (0–0.25), low susceptibility (0.25–0.5), high susceptibility (0.5–0.75), and very high susceptibility (0.75–1), the observed landslide density at the very high susceptibility level is 0.303/km2, 0.212/km2, and 0.195/km2 for the expert knowledge-based model, the logistic regression model, and the artificial neural network model, respectively. This suggests that the expert knowledge-based model was much better than the other two data-driven models at evaluating landslide occurrence in very high susceptibility areas. When the three models developed in the Kaixian area were applied in the Three Gorges area without any changes, their prediction accuracy dropped to 44.8% for the logistic regression model and 81.6% for the artificial neural network model, while the expert knowledge-based model maintained its initial accuracy level of 82.8%. The landslide density for the very high susceptibility areas in the Three Georges area was 0.275/km2, 0.082/km2, and 0.060/km2 for the expert knowledge-based model, the logistic model, and the artificial neural network model, respectively. These results indicate that the expert knowledge-based model is more effective at predicting areas with very high susceptibility. When the Three Gorges area was used as a model development area and the Kaixian area was used as the model application area, similar results were obtained. Results from the two experiments show that the performance of the logistic regression model and artificial neural network model is not as stable as the expert knowledge-based model when transferred to a new area. This suggests that the expert knowledge-based model is more suitable for landslide susceptibility mapping over large areas.

The Comparison of Three Statistical Methods on Landslide Susceptibility Analysis:A Case Study of Shenzhen City

Performance Evaluation of the GIS-based Data Mining Techniques of Best-First Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Naïve Bayes Tree for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling

GIS-based Comparative Study of Bayes Network, Hoeffding Tree and Logistic Model Tree for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping and Model Performance Assessment

A Comparative Study of Functional Data Analysis and Generalized Linear Model Data-Mining Techniques for Landslide Spatial Modeling

A Comparative Study of an Expert Knowledge-Based Model and Two Data-Driven Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping

Landslide Susceptibility Modeling Based on GIS and Novel Bagging-Based Kernel Logistic Regression

Comparison and Integration of Heuristic and Statistical Models of Landslide Susceptibility Mapping.

A Comparative Study of Landslide Susceptibility Maps Using Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Decision Tree, Weights of Evidence and Artificial Neural Network

Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods

A comparative study of regional landslide susceptibility mapping with multiple machine learning models

GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping in the Longmen Mountain area (China) using three different machine learning algorithms and their comparison

Comparisons of Convolutional Neural Network and Other Machine Learning Methods in Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: A Case Study in Pingwu

Landslide susceptibility assessment using object mapping units, decision tree, and support vector machine models in the Three Gorges of China

GIS-based logistic regression for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility mapping under different grid sizes in Yueqing, Southeastern China

Mapping Landslide Susceptibility Using Machine Learning Algorithms and GIS: A Case Study in Shexian County, Anhui Province, China

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping and Driving Mechanisms in a Vulnerable Region Based on Multiple Machine Learning Models

Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Using Hybrid Integration of Evidential Belief Function and Machine Learning Techniques

Comparison of Logistic Regression, Information Value, and Comprehensive Evaluating Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping

Comparison of Different Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping

Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of the Five Kinds of Models in Landslide Susceptibility Map for Factor Screening: A Case Study at Zigui-Badong in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China