Abstract:The latest research on disturbance rejection mechanisms has shown active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) to be an effective controller for uncertainties and nonlinear dynamics em-bedded in systems to be controlled. The significance of the ADRC controller is its model-free nature, as it requires minimal knowledge of the system model. In addition, it can actively estimate and compensate for the impact of internal and external disturbances present, with the aid of its crucial subsystem called the extended state observer (ESO). However, ADRC controller design becomes more challenging owing to different system disturbances, such as output disturbances, measure-ment noise, and varying time-delays persistent in the system's communication channels. Most dis-turbance rejection techniques aim to reduce internal perturbations and external disturbances (input and output disturbance). However, output disturbance rejection with measurement noise under time-delay control is still a challenging problem. This paper presents a novel predictive ESO-based ADRC controller for time-delay systems by employing predictive methods to compensate for the disturbances originating from time delay. The prediction mechanism of the novel (proposed) con-troller design is greatly attributed to the extended state predictor observer (ESPO) integrated with the delay-based ADRC inside the proposed controller method. Thus, the proposed controller can predict the unknown system dynamics generated during the delay and compensate for these dy-namics via disturbance rejection under time-delay control. This approach uses the optimization mechanism to determine controller parameters, where the genetic algorithm (GA) is employed with the integral of time-weighted absolute error (ITAE) as the fitness function. The proposed controller is validated by controlling second-order systems with time delay. Type 0, Type 1, and Type 2 sys-tems are considered as the controlled plants, with disturbances (unknown dynamics due to delay and external disturbance), along with measurement noise present. The proposed controller method is compared with state-of-the-art methods, such as the modified time-delay-based ADRC method and the ESPO-based controller method. The findings indicate that the method proposed in this pa-per outperforms its existing competitors by compensating for the dynamics during the time delay and shows robust behaviour, improved disturbance rejection, and a fair extent of resilience to noise.

Active Decoupling For Double-Loop Delayed Systems With Adrc Techniques

Decoupling Double-Loop Control System with ADRC

Active Disturbance Rejection Control Based Simplified Decoupling for Two-Input-two-output Processes

Reduced Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Time-delay Systems

Predictive Extended State Observer-Based Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Systems with Time Delay

On Comparison of Modified ADRCs for Nonlinear Uncertain Systems with Time Delay

Frequency response-based decoupling tuning for feedforward compensation ADRC of distributed parameter systems

Robust Compensation for Active Disturbance Rejection Control of a Class of High‐order Systems with Large Time Delay: Simulation and Experimental Studies

Analysis and Design of Active Disturbance Rejection Control with Improved Extended State Observer for Systems with Measurement Noise

Design of Multi-Loop ADRC Controllers Based on the Effective Open-Loop Transfer Function Method

A Novel Design of Active Disturbance Rejection Control for TITO Systems

Comparison of the Phase Margins of Different ADRC Designs

Novel Active Disturbance Rejection Control Based on Nested Linear Extended State Observers

A modified active disturbance rejection control strategy based on cascade structure with enhanced robustness

Current-Loop Control for the Pitching Axis of Aerial Cameras via an Improved ADRC

Adaptive active disturbance rejection control guaranteeing uniformly ultimate boundedness and simplicity

Adaptive tracking control of dual position loops drive using active-disturbance- rejection control

Active disturbance rejection control to stabilization of coupled delayed time fractional-order reaction–advection–diffusion systems with boundary disturbances and spatially varying coefficients

Decentralized controller design based on 3-order active-disturbance-rejection-control

Quantitative Analysis on the Phase Margin of ADRC

A Two-Layer Active Disturbance Rejection Controller Design for Load Frequency Control of Interconnected Power System