Construction and Immunogenicity of Recombinant Expression Vectors for GP5 and M Proteins of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus

周井祥,薛江东,张嘉保,刘殿峰,袁宝,扈荣良
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13200/j.cjb.2009.03.14.zhoujx.005
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To construct the recombinant expression vectors for GP5 and M proteins of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), as a DNA vaccine, and determine its immunogenicity. Methods The GP5 and M gene frag-ments of PRRSV were amplified by RT-PCR and cloned into eukaryotic expression vector pIRES-neo to construct recombinant plas-mids pIRES-G and pIRES-M respectively. Mice were divided into 3 test and 2 control groups. The mice in 3 test groups were immu-nized for 3 times with recombinant plasmids pIRES-G, pIRES-M and pIRES-G + pIRES-M, while those in 2 control groups with plas-mid pIRES-neo and a domestic inactivated PRRSV vaccine, respectively. The ELISA antibody and neutralizing antibody in sera as well as splenic lymphocyte proliferation level were determined before and at various weeks after immunization. Results Restriction analysis proved that recombinant plasmids pIRES-G and pIRES-M were constructed correctly. The ELISA antibody titers in sera of mice 4 weeks after the 1st immunization increased significantly in pIRES-G, pIRES-M and pIRES-G + pIRES-M groups, which was significantly higher in pIRES-G + pIRES-M group than in the other 2 test groups. Nine weeks after the 1st immunization, the neutral-izing antibody titers in sera of mice in pIRES-G + pIRES-M group(1 ∶ 16)was higher than those in pIRES-G(1 ∶ 8)and pIRES-M (1 ∶ 4)groups, while lower than those in inactivated PRRSV vaccine group(1 ∶ 64). Meanwhile, compared with those in pIRES-neo group, the splenic lymphocytes of mice in pIRES-G + pIRES-M, pIRES-G, pIRES-M and inactivated PRRSV vaccine groups proliferat-ed significantly after stimulation with specific (PRRSV)or non-specific (ConA)antigen. However, the proliferation level of splenic lymphocytes after stimulation with ConA was slightly higher than that with PRRSV antigen. Conclusion The recombinant expression vectors for GP5 and M proteins of PRRSV was successfully constructed, and the combined immunization with them showed satisfactory immune effect.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?