Clinical observation on recombinant human vascular endostatin combined wih XELOX regimen in the treatment of advanced stomach carcinoma

江丰收,王刚,孙玉蓓,姚艺伟,季楚舒,胡冰
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2009.08.018
2009-01-01
Tumor
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the short-term effects and safety of recombinant human vascular endostatin (endostar, YH-16) combined with XELOX (oxaliplatin + capecitabine) regimen for advanced stomach carcinoma and to explore the relationship between the serum level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the clinical outcome. Methods: Forty-two patients with relapse of stage IV advanced stomach carcinoma were randomly divided into two groups. The testing group received YH-16 plus XELOX regimen , and the control group were given XELOX chemotherapy only. All the patients received at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy. The complete response rate (CR), partial response rate (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were observed. The CR + PR was defined as response rate (RR) and CR + PR + SD was difined as clinical benefit rate (CBR). The quality of life (QOL) was evaluated and the serum VEGF level of the two groups were measured before and after treatment. Results: The RR was 40.0% in testing group and 22.7% in control group (P < 0.05). The CBR was 75.0% in testing group and 59.1% in control group (P < 0.05). The median tumor to progression (TTP) time was 6.9 months and 3.9 months for testing group and control group, respectively (P < 0.05). The scores of QOL in the two groups were both increased but the increasing rate was significantly higher in testing group than that in control group (P < 0.05). The levels of serum VEGF in the two groups were decreased significantly after treatment and the decreasing degree was higher in testing group than that in control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant difference in the incidence of mode-rate to severe adverse reaction between testing group and control group. Conclusion: The rh-endostatin combined with XELOX regimen is effective, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced stomach carcinoma. It is worthy of extending its clinical application. VEGF may be a good biomarker in predicting the efficacy of the chemotherapy combined with anti-angiogenetic therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?