[Preliminary Study on Epidemiology of Deep Venous Thrombosis of Lower Extremity in Patients with High Risk].

Wan Zhang,Zhen-yu Shi,Wei-guo Fu,Yu-qi Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2009.45.004
2009-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To make preliminary cross-sectional study on epidemiology of deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity of inpatients with high risk in Zhongshan hospital, and analyze risk factors in these patients. METHODS From Sep 2008 and Feb 2009, we performed compressed ultrasound to detect deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity of in-patients with high-risk in Zhongshan hospital, including bedrid stroke patients, post-surgery bedrid patients from department of orthopaedics, gynecology, general surgery and vascular surgery and patients of surgical intensive care unit. Prevalence rate of DVT of the whole study group as well as each department were calculated and analyzed. We collected detailed clinical information of each recruited patient. We made statistical single-factor and then Logistic regression multiple-factor analysis of these data with SPSS 16.0, to determine high risks of deep vein thrombosis of in-patients. RESULTS (1) Totally 372 patients were enrolled in our study with 38 patients detected with DVT of lower extremity, so the prevalence rate of whole series was 10.2% (38/372). (2) High risks of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis for the whole series were bedrid time (30 day boundary) (P = 0.000), thrombin time (P = 0.007) and history of vascular surgery (P = 0.009). (3) The prevalence rate of DVT of lower extremity of department of neurology, orthopaedics and gynecology were 12.7% (13/102), of 10.0% (10/100) and 6.3% (7/111) respectively. (4) High risk for DVT in post-surgery gynecological patients was resection of uterus and both attachments (P = 0.032). CONCLUSION In our study, the prevalence rate of DVT of lower extremity for high-risk in-patients was high, most of whom were asymptomatic and left-sided. High risk factors were bedrid time (30 day boundary), thrombin time and history of vascular surgery. It is necessary to strengthen prophylactic anticoagulation in these patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?