Comparison of the therapeutic effect between interventional treatment and anticoagulation therapy alone in patients with intracranial venous sinus thrombosis

Hong-feng WEN,Ji-chen DU,Ji-lai LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2009.01.006
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare evaluate the efficacy of interventional thrombolysis and the anti-coagulation therapy alone for intracranial venous sinus thrombosis. Methods: Forty pa\tients were diagnosed as intracranial venous sinus thrombosis by clinical, MRI, and MRV examination. They were divided into anticoagulation therapy group (group A, n = 20) and interventional treatment group (group B, n = 20). Heparin 100 mg/24 h was infused intravenously during the first 3 days, and after that warfarin was administered orally for half a year in patients of group A; Interventional thrombolysis in combination with mechanical thrombus maceration, balloon or stent angioplasty were performed and anticoagulant therapy was continued for 6 months in patients of group B. The present symptom (headache) of the patients was scored by visual analog scale (VAS) at the different time points before and 3 days, 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment. The neurological function of the patients at the different time points before and after the treatment were evaluated by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Results: 1 The VAS score was 8.2 ± 2.3 three days after the treatment in group A, and it was 3.5 ± 1.6 in group B; the VAS score was 4.9 ± 1.4 three months after the treatment in group A, and it was 2.2 ± 1.5 in group B. There were significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). 2 The NIHSS scores were 14.7 ± 2.0, 10.4 ± 1.4, 9.5 ± 1.9, and 7.1 ± 1.2 respectively at 3 day, 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment in group A, and they were 9.0 ± 0.8, 7.0 ± 1.7, 6.1 ± 2.2, and 5.5 ± 2.1 in group B. There were significant differences between the two groups at the same time point (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Interventional treatment for intracranial venous sinus thrombosis may relieve the present symptoms of the patients and improve their prognosis faster than anticoagulant therapy alone.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?