Three-dimensional 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of prostate gland: using body coil and endorectal coil

Xin-min LI,Xiao-ying WANG,Xue-mei GUO,He WANG,Xue-xiang JIANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2009.05.037
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the quality of 3D 1H-MRSI of body coil (BODY) and endorectal coil (ERC) in prostate gland examination, and to discuss the clinical feasibility of BODY MRS. Methods: Both BODY and ERC MRS were performed in 40 consecutive patients, and measurable MRS data was obtained in 30 patients. The right and left side of the peripheral and central zone of prostate were divided into bottom, middle and tip regions of interesting (ROI), respectively. Twelve ROIs were obtained in each case. The following parameters relating of MRS quality were compared, i. e. signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lipid peak and ratio of (Cho+Cre)/Cit. Results: Circled digit oneThe SNR in the peripheral zone of different individuals using ERC was statistically higher than that of using BODY MRS (P<0.05). The SNR in the central gland of bottom using ERC was statistically higher than that of using BODY MRS (P<0.05). Circled digit twoThe Lipid Peak in the peripheral zone of the bottom and the left of tip acquired using ERC was statistically higher than that of using BODY MRS (P<0.05). The Lipid Peak in the central zone of the bottom and the left of middle acquired using ERC was statistically higher than that of using BODY MRS (P<0.05). Circled digit threeThe mean ratios of (Cho+Cre)/Cit in the peripheral zone and central zone of different individuals acquired using both coils were not significantly different (P>0.05). Conclusion: The MRS data can be reliably acquired using BODY MRSI, while the SNR and the Lipid Peak of BODY are inferior to those of ERC MRS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?