Effect of low-frequency suprathreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor evoked potential and neurological functional recovery in patients with cerebral infarction

Rong ZOU,He-qing ZHAO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2009.02.003

2009-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To study the effect of low-frequency suprathreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor evoked potential (MEP) and neurological functional recovery in patients with cerebral infarction. Methods: A total of 30 patients with middle cerebral artery territory infarction were randomly assigned to receive ipsilateral stimulation, contralateral stimulation and natural recovery groups (did not receive any stimulation) (n = 10 in each group). The patients were treated with rTMS 3 to 5 days after the onset of symptoms, the frequency was 0.5 Hz, the intensity was 70% (3.0 T), and 900 pulses per day for 10 days. The MEP latency, wave amplitude, central motor conduction time (CMCT) values, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the activities of daily living (ADL) scores of the affected brain region (M1) were recorded at day 1 (before the treatment), 10, and 40 days after treatment. Results: 1 As compared with the natural recovery group and contralateral stimulation groups at day 1, the MEP latency was shortened, the wave amplitude was increased, and the CMCT was not delayed at day 10 and 40 in the ipsilateral stimulation group. With the prolong of treatment time, there were more significant differences (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). Comparing the contralateral stimulation group and the natural recovery group, there were no significant differences among the above indicators (P > 0.05); however, in comparison between the both groups, there was significant difference between the wave amplitude and CMCT at day 40 and day 1 (P < 0.05). 2 As compared with the 2 stimulation groups at day 1, there were significant differences between the scores of NIHSS and ADL at day 10 and 40, and there was more significant difference at day 40 (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences at all time points between the 2 stimulation groups. 3 The MEP latency and CMCT at different time points was positively correlated with NIHSS; and they were negatively correlated with the ADL scores; the wave amplitude was negatively correlated with NIHSS, and it was positively correlated with ADL scores (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). Conclusions: rTMS acting on ipsilateral brain regions in patients with cerebral infarction has significant impact on MEP. It has promoting effect on neurological functional recovery; acting on contralateral side only has promoting effect on neurological functional recovery.