Abstract:Derivatives of differential equation solutions are commonly for parameter estimation, fitting neural differential equations, and as model diagnostics. However, with a litany of choices and a Cartesian product of potential methods, it can be difficult for practitioners to understand which method is likely to be the most effective on their particular application. In this manuscript we investigate the performance characteristics of Discrete Local Sensitivity Analysis implemented via Automatic Differentiation (DSAAD) against continuous adjoint sensitivity analysis. Non-stiff and stiff biological and pharmacometric models, including a PDE discretization, are used to quantify the performance of sensitivity analysis methods. Our benchmarks show that on small stiff and non-stiff systems of ODEs (approximately < 100 parameters+ODEs), forward-mode DSAAD is more efficient than both reverse-mode and continuous forward/adjoint sensitivity analysis. The scalability of continuous adjoint methods is shown to be more efficient than discrete adjoints and forward methods after crossing this size range. These comparative studies demonstrate a trade-off between memory usage and performance in the continuous adjoint methods that should be considered when choosing the technique, while numerically unstable backsolve techniques from the machine learning literature are demonstrated as unsuitable for most scientific models. The performance of adjoint methods is shown to be heavily tied to the reverse-mode AD method used for the vector-Jacobian product calculations, with tape-based AD methods shown to be 2 orders of magnitude slower on nonlinear partial differential equations than static AD techniques. In addition, these results demonstrate the out-of-the-box applicability of DSAAD to differential-algebraic equations, delay differential equations, and hybrid differential equation systems where the event timing and effects are dependent on model parameters, showcasing an ease of implementation advantage for DSAAD approaches. Together, these benchmarks provide a guide to help practitioners to quickly identify the best mixture of continuous sensitivities and automatic differentiation for their applications.

Precise Integration Method for Sensitivity Analysis of Linear ODEs

Numerical Simulation for the System of Ordinary Differential Equations

A Novel Analytical Second‐order Sensitivity Calculation Approach Using the Finite Element Method for Chemical Engineering Problems

Analytical Sensitivity Computation Using Collocation Method with Non-Uniform Mesh Discretisation for Numerical Solutions of Optimal Control Problems

Engineering Analysis Error Estimation when Removing Finite-Sized Features in Nonlinear Elliptic Problems.

Stabilization of a Second Order ODE-heat System Coupling at Intermediate Point

Sensitivity analysis of differential-algebraic equations and partial differential equations

A systematic approach to obtain the analytical solution for coupled linear second-order ordinary differential equations: Part II

A sensitivity analysis method for linear and nonlinear transient heat conduction with precise time integration

Exploration of methods for computing sensitivities in ODE models at dynamic and steady states

A Comparison of Automatic Differentiation and Continuous Sensitivity Analysis for Derivatives of Differential Equation Solutions

Transient Response Sensitivity Analysis of Localized Nonlinear Structure Using Direct Differentiation Method

State-space based discretize-then-differentiate adjoint sensitivity method for transient responses of non-viscously damped systems

Design sensitivity analysis: Overview and review

Parameter Estimation and Variable Selection for Big Systems of Linear Ordinary Differential Equations: A Matrix-Based Approach

A comparative study of design sensitivity analysis based on adjoint variable method for transient response of non-viscously damped systems

Sensitivity Approximation by the Peano-Baker Series

A Matrix Framework for the Solution of ODEs: Initial-, Boundary-, and Inner-Value Problems

Design sensitivity analysis of dynamic response of nonviscously damped systems

High accuracy least-squares solutions of nonlinear differential equations

Modeling and sensitivity analysis methodology for hybrid dynamical systems