Methods comparison of soil heat flux in remote sensing model to estimate evapotranspiration

HongJuan Yang,Zhentao Cong,Zhidong Lei
2009-01-01
Abstract:When estimating evapotranspiration with remote sensing models, soil heat flux (G) is needed to determine the energy available to be partitioned into latent and sensible heat fluxes. In this paper we compared five methods to determine this part of energy. Four of them treat G as a portion of net radiation (Rn). In the first method, only vegetation index is considered to estimate this proportion and is called vegetation index-based ratio (VegR) method. In the second method, surface temperature and albedo are also allowed for and is called multifactor ratio (MulR) method. In the third method, a cosine function is employed to describe G to Rn (G/Rn) value and is called cosine function-based ratio (CosR) method. We modified it and put forward the fourth method-Modified CosR (MCosR) method. The fifth method estimates G through harmonic analysis of surface temperature and is named harmonic method. We used data from a high covered grass site, a sparse shrub site and a bare soil site to evaluate each method. The first two methods perform well at the grass site while they are not effective at the other two sites. The CosR method is only effective at the shrub site while the MCosR method also performs well at the bare soil site. Errors with the harmonic method are small at all the three sites. So we concluded that 1) the VegR and MulR methods are only usable for dense vegetation; 2) the MCosR method can be used for bare soil and sparse cover conditions; and 3) the harmonic method is applicable for all conditions. In this paper we also analyzed why the four ratio-based methods lack universal applicability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?