An Improved Grid-Xinanjiang Model and Its Application in the Jinshajiang Basin, China
Changqing Meng,Jianzhong Zhou,Deyu Zhong,Chao Wang,Jun Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091265
IF: 3.53
2018-01-01
Water
Abstract:A modified form of the distributed Grid-Xinanjiang model (GXAJ) characterizing the infiltration excess and saturation excess runoff mechanisms coupled to a two-source potential evapotranspiration model (TSPE) was proposed to simulate the hydrological process and study the spatiotemporal pattern of the precipitation, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture in the Jinshajiang River basin. In the flow routing module, the flow is routed by the physically nonlinear Muskingum–Cunge method. The TSPE model can calculate the spatiotemporal variation of the potential canopy transpiration (CT), interception evaporation (IE), and potential soil evaporation (SE). Subsequently, the calculated potential evapotranspiration (PE) is coupled to the GXAJ model to calculate the water budget in each grid. An a priori parameter estimation was developed to obtain the spatially varied parameters from geographical data, including digital elevation model (DEM) data, soil data, vegetation data, and routing data. Hydrometeorological data were interpolated to 4750 grids with cell sizes of 10 km × 10 km by the Thiessen Polygon method. The DEM data was used to extract the flow direction, river length, hillslope, and channel slopes and to adjust the altitude-related meteorological variables. The reprocessed Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) leaf area index (LAI) from the Beijing Normal University (BNU) dataset, which has a spatial resolution of 1 km × 1 km, was used to obtain the spatiotemporal variation in the LAI. The developed GXAJ model was applied to three sub-basins in the Jinshajiang River basin and was compared to the traditional GXAJ model. The developed GXAJ model satisfactorily reproduced the streamflow at each catchment outlet and matched the peak discharges better than the traditional GXAJ model for both the dry and wet seasons. The uneven distribution of the simulated mean annual evapotranspiration in the whole watershed was closely related to the vegetation types, ranging from 189.81 to 585.45 mm. Forest and woodland, shrubland, grassland, and cropland were shown to have mean annual evapotranspiration values of 485.6, 289.4, 275.9, and 392.3 mm, respectively. The ratios of the annual evapotranspiration to precipitation (E/P) of the forest, woodland, shrubland, grassland, and cropland were 54, 83, 53, and 48%, respectively.