Abstract:Due to tight development time, the production and test code may not be co‐changed immediately. Therefore, we propose a novel approach, Jtup, to remind developers to co‐change the production code and test code by using a learning‐based method. Experiment results show that Jtup outperforms the state‐of‐the‐art. In software evolution, keeping the test code co‐change with the production code is important, because the outdated test code may not work and is ineffective in revealing faults in the production code. However, due to the tight development time, the production and test code may not be co‐changed immediately by developers. For example, we analysed the top 1003 popular Java projects on GitHub and found that nearly 9.3% of cases (i.e., 464,417) did not update their production and test code at the same time, that is, the production code is updated first, and then the test code is updated at intervals. The result indicates that much test code will not be updated in time. In this paper, we propose a novel approach, Jtup, to remind developers to co‐change the production code and test code in time. Specifically, we first define the co‐changed production and test code as a positive instance, while unchanged test code (i.e., production code changed and test code unchanged) as a negative instance. Then, we extract multidimensional features from the production code to characterize the possibility of their co‐change, including code change features, code complexity features, and code semantic features. Finally, several machine learning‐based methods are employed to identify the co‐changed production and test code. We conduct comprehensive experiments on 20 datasets, and the results show that the Accuracy, Precision, and Recall achieved by Jtup are 76.7%, 78.1%, and 77.4%, which outperforms the state‐of‐the‐art method.

Predicting Co-Changed Software Entities in the Context of Software Evolution

Early Prediction of Merged Code Changes to Prioritize Reviewing Tasks

Understanding Widespread Changes: A Taxonomic Study

Revealing code change propagation channels by evolution history mining

Enhancing Software Co-Change Prediction: Leveraging Hybrid Approaches for Improved Accuracy

Evaluating Software Evolution Based on Pattern Mining.

Ast Based Java Software Evolution Analysis

Understanding Evolutionary Coupling by Fine-Grained Co-Change Relationship Analysis

Enhancing Software Maintenance: A Learning to Rank Approach for Co-changed Method Identification

When functions change their names: automatic detection of origin relationships

Do Code Data Sharing Dependencies Support an Early Prediction of Software Actual Change Impact Set?

Assessing the Impact of Software on Science: A Bootstrapped Learning of Software Entities in Full-Text Papers.

Watch out for This Commit! A Study of Influential Software Changes

Understanding Systematic and Collaborative Code Changes by Mining Evolutionary Trajectory Patterns

API Usage Change Rules Mining Based on Fine-grained Call Dependency Analysis.

Identifying change patterns in software history

Understanding Code Change with Micro-Changes

An Empirical Study on the Characteristics of Python Fine-Grained Source Code Change Types.

Visual exploration of software evolution via topic modeling

Detecting Source Code Changes to Maintain the Consistence of Behavioral Model

Towards automatically identifying the co‐change of production and test code