Comparison between Plastic Radius around a Circular Opening Derived from Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion and Calculated through Modified Fenner Formula

Qianbang ZENG,Enzhi WANG,Sijing WANG
2008-01-01
Abstract:In order to quantitatively determine and provide scientific basis for the support design of rockbolt depth in surrounding rock around underground tunnels, the closed-form analytical solutions for the elasto-plastic stress field and plastic radius in an elastic-perfectly plastic surrounding rock around a circular opening were derived from the Hoek-Brown failure criterion as the limit equilibrium condition, on condition that the lateral pressure coefficient equals to 1.0. By means of fitting the non-linear Hoek-Brown failure criterion with the linear Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion and an area compensation method, after obtaining the equivalent Mohr-Coulomb strength parameters, a bi-variable non-linear regression mathematic model for the relative plastic radius varied with the support pressure and the Geologic Strength Index (GSI) was formulated to compare with the modified Fenner formula, which was originated from the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion. An increment of the support pressure per 1.0 MPa could guarantee that no plastic zone exited in the rock with the GSI decrement of 10-20. The difference of plastic radius between compatible with the Hoek-Brown failure criterion and calculated from the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion was slightly greater only in poor-quality rock and low support pressure. Minus power function relationships between the relative plastic radius and the GSI value were indicated both for the two yield criterions and the descending trend of plastic radius with the increment of rock quality grade became gentler when the support pressure increased. The bi-variable no-linear regression mathematic models for the relative plastic radius varied with support pressure and the GSI value was concise and, since the regression equations made the support pressure varied continuously, their engineer practicability was boosted. It was reasonable that 1.8-3.0 times of tunnel's radius was adopted as the rockbolt depth when the rock quality was poor.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?