Monomeric Trna (M(7)G46) Methyltransferase From Escherichia Coli Presents A Novel Structure At The Function-Essential Insertion
Huihao Zhou,Qi Liu,Weili Yang,Yongxiang Gao,Maikun Teng,Liwen Niu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22413
2009-01-01
Abstract:The maturation of tRNAs is a complex process involving numerous post-transcriptional modifications. N7-methylguanosine modification at position 46 (m7G46) in the variable loop is one of the few modifications that introduce a positive charge to the base,1 and is conserved in almost all of class I tRNAs in bacteria, eukaryotes and some archaea.2 When lacking m7G46 in combination with other nonessential modifications, the yeast cellular tRNAs are sent to the rapid tRNA degradation (RTD) pathway.3 Recently, m7G46 enzymes were also shown to be essential to pathogenicity in C. lagenarium4 and spermatogenesis in Drosophila.5 In humans, m7G46 is linked to the insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling pathway.6 In prokaryotes, tRNA (m7G46) methyltransferases are composed of a single subunit, TrmB,7 while in eukaryotes they are composed by two subunits, Trm8 and Trm82.8 TrmB and Trm8 are orthologs, and belong to the class I S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferase superfamily. E. coli TrmB (EcTrmB), the first identified TrmB, is a monomer,7 but many other TrmBs form homodimers in solution.9, 10 Recently, the structures of two homodimeric TrmBs from B. subtilis (BsTrmB) and S. pneumonia (SpTrmB), the Trm8 from H. sapiens (HsTrm8, also known as METTL1) and the Trm8-Trm82 heterodimer from S. cerevisiae (ScTrm8-Trm82) have been determined.10, 11 TrmB and Trm8 adopt a modified Rossmann fold.10, 11 In the ScTrm82-Trm8 complex, Trm82 plays an essential role on activating Trm8 by regulating the conformation of Trm8's N-terminus and the β4-αD loop.11 The interface of homodimeric TrmBs is totally different from ScTrm8-Trm82,10 which suggests that the homodimer and heterodimer are unrelated in evolution. Here, we report the structures of EcTrmB as the representative of monomeric TrmBs. Structure of EcTrmB presents novel features at the function-essential insertion and at the interface region of dimeric TrmBs. Structure analysis provides some clues to understand the function of the family of TrmBs. Protein preparation, crystallization and data collection of apo EcTrmB were described previously.12 EcTrmB in complex with SAM (EcTrmB:SAM) and S-adenosyl-L- homocysteine (EcTrmB:SAH) were crystallized in conditions similar to that of the native protein with the addition of 5 mM SAM and SAH respectively. Seleno-methionine (SeMet) substituted EcTrmB protein was overexpressed in conditions similar to that previously described,13 and crystallized in the same conditions as the native protein. Native data for EcTrmB:SAM and EcTrmB:SAH and single-wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) data for the SeMet substituted EcTrmB were collected using vitrified crystals on beamline 3W1A of the Beijing synchrotron radiation facility (BSRF). Data were processed with MOSFLM14 and programs in CCP4.15 The structure of SeMet-substituted EcTrmB was determined by SAD method. Ten of the twelve expected selenium atoms in the asymmetric unit were found using the program SOLVE,16 and the overall figure of merit (FOM) was 0.42. After the density modification with RESOLVE,17 the FOM was improved to 0.70. Then, 176 of all the 218 residues in the asymmetric unit were built automatically by RESOLVE. The structures of native EcTrmB and the two complexes were solved by molecular replacement using the SeMet-substituted structure as a searching model. Structure rebuilding and refinement were performed with COOT18 and Refmac5.19 The structures of EcTrmB, EcTrmB:SAM and EcTrmB:SAH were refined to 2.0 Å, 1.5 Å, and 1.6 Å resolution, and the corresponding R/Rfree values were 19.3%/22.7%, 15.4%/18.5%, and 17.4%/19.3%, respectively. The final models have good stereochemical quality when assessed with MolProbity.20 Details of data collection and refinement statistics are listed in Table I. The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in PDB under the codes 3DXX, 3DXY, and 3DXZ. EcTrmB adopts a modified Rossmann fold like its homologs [Fig. 1(A)]. The central β-sheet contains seven strands arranged in the order β3β2β1β4β5β7β6, and β7 is antiparallel to others. αA to αE flank the β-sheet with αA and αB on one side and αC to αE on the other side [Fig. 1(A)]. At the N-terminus of EcTrmB, residues 36–65 form another two α helices (αN1 and αN2) near the β2, β3, and αB. In the β4-αD linker, basic residues 150–154 form a short positive-charged η-helix. Calculated with THESEUS,21 a program superimposing macromolecular structures using the maximum-likehood method, RMSDML21 values between EcTrmB and BsTrmB, SpTrmB, ScTrm8 and HsTrm8 are 0.19 Å for 195 Cα atoms, 0.23 Å for 201 Cα atoms, 0.22 Å for 178 Cα atoms and 0.20 Å for 184 Cα atoms, respectively. (A) The cartoon drawing of overall structure of EcTrmB. The protein is colored in red for αA to αE, yellow for β-strands, gray for loops, green for the insertion sequence, and magenta for the η-helix and the two α helices at N terminus. What in the trapezium is the C-terminal part of the TrmB/Trm8-specific insertion. (B) Structural comparison of the TrmB/Trm8-specific insertions of EcTrmB (green), BsTrmB (blue) and ScTrm8p (orange). The β-sheets of each protein are superimposed. The conserved Thr residues, SAM and a modeled guanine are showed as stick models. (C) In BsTrmB, the insertion (blue) of Subunit A (light gray) is restricted to fold between Subunit B (black) and its own αA. (D) The EcTrmB homodimer model was constructed by superimposing two EcTrmB molecules to the two subunits of BsTrmB. The protruding loops from an EcTrmB molecule conflict with the other molecule. Only the β6 (yellow), αE (red) and the TrmB/Trm8-specific insertions (green) of two EcTrmBs are shown. Figures are generated with PyMol (http://www.pymol.org/). The β6-β7 linker is a TrmB/Trm8-specific and function-essential insertion to the core fold of class I SAM-dependent methyltransferases.10, 22 With the exception of the ligand pocket, the C-terminal part of this insertion is one of few conserved regions in the TrmB surface. In EcTrmB, this insertion forms a long loop without any stably secondary structural element [Fig. 1(A)], and its C-terminal part separates from the ligand pocket for several angstroms, which disrupts the deduced G46-binding pocket [Fig. 1(B)]. However, in all the TrmB/Trm8 structures reported previously, the C-terminal part of the insertion folds to a C-terminal α helix (αCT) close to the ligand pocket and the deduced binding site of base G46 [Fig. 1(B)].10, 11 The αCT in combination with the β4-αD loop was proposed to sandwich the variable loop of tRNA.11 TrmB/Trm8 enzymes use the SAM as the methyl group donor and produce the methylated tRNA and SAH. In all the TrmB/Trm8 structures reported previously, a conserved Thr (Thr217 in EcTrmB) locates near the entrance of the αCT, and forms two hydrogen bonds with the carboxyl group of SAM/SAH [Fig. 1(B)].10, 11 We supposed that, in EcTrmB, the conserved hydrogen bonds between the Thr217 and ligand should also exist after ligand binding, and they could contribute to tether the C-terminal part of the TrmB/Trm8-specific insertion to the ligand and even induce the formation of the G46 pocket. We determined the structures of EcTrmB in complex with the SAM and SAH ligands. However, in both complexes, the structure of the insertion is similar to that in the apoenzyme, and the supposed hydrogen bonds between ligands and the Thr217 are not observed (Supporting Information Fig. S1). It seems that a structural rearrangement of the β6-β7 insertion in EcTrmB may be required to form the G46-binding pocket in catalysis, and the rearrangement would occur during tRNA binding like some other tRNA modification enzymes.23 Different to EcTrmB, some prokaryotic TrmBs, such as BsTrmB and SpTrmB, form the homodimer in solution. But, the significance of their homodimerization is unknown. One possible situation is that capturing a tRNA needs the cooperation of two TrmBs, and the two TrmBs form a transient dimer. The BsTrmB/SpTrmB is the stable form of the transient dimer. To test that hypothesis, we employed the cross-linking assay to detect the supposed EcTrmB dimer in the buffer in which EcTrmB-tRNA interactions have been confirmed by gel shift assay (Supporting Information Fig. S2). However, no dimers are found (Supporting Information Fig. S3). Here, the structure distinction of the β6-β7 insertion between EcTrmB and BsTrmB/SpTrmB suggests that stabilizing the structure of this insertion may be a possible function of the homodimerization. In homodimeric TrmBs, the insertion of a subunit is restricted to fold between the other subunit and its own αA, which prevents its C-terminal part separating from the ligand and helps αCT to fold near the G46 pocket [Fig. 1(C)]. Evolving from monomer to homodimer reduces a potential structural rearrangement step in catalysis, which may be helpful for better catalytic efficiency. In homodimeric TrmBs, the interface is mainly composed of β6 and αE where residues are not conserved. Particularly, the hydrophobic residues Val176 and Leu178 in β6 of BsTrmB/SpTrmB, which stack at the dimeric interface, are replaced by Glu203 and Asn205 in EcTrmB. In contrast to Val176 and Leu178 of BsTrmB/SpTrmB, Glu203 and Asn205 of EcTrmB are reversed to solvent. Their reversal destroys the last part of β6 and lets the residues 202–206 form a protruding loop at the dimer interface (Supporting Information Fig. S4). Additionally, because the β6-β7 insertion separates from ligand pocket in EcTrmB, residues 223–227 form another protruding loop. These protruding loops would cause many conflicts if EcTrmB dimerized as BsTrmB/SpTrmB [Fig. 1(D)], which provides the structural insight to why monomeric TrmBs do not form dimers. The authors thank the staff at beamline 3W1A of BSRF for help on data collection. Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.