Abstract:Recent years have seen great advances in software engineering and programming languages. Unfortunately, software is still far from bug-free, even for those deployed. Static analysis is a good approach to eliminating numerous bugs, but its conservative nature of analysis unavoidably constrains its capacity. Dynamic analysis, on the other hand, utilizes program runtime execution data, which complements static approaches. This thesis describes three dynamic techniques that leverage program runtime data to improve software quality.First, we present a statistical debugging algorithm, called S OBER, which automatically localizes software faults without any prior knowledge of the program semantics. This statistical debugging alleviates the high cost associated with manual debugging. Featuring a similar rationale to hypothesis testing, SOBER quantifies the fault relevance of each predicate in a principled way. We systematically evaluate S OBER under the same setting as previous studies, and compare S OBER with other seven algorithms. The result clearly demonstrates the advantages of SOBER over existing approaches.Second, we discuss automated program failure triage, which is a closely related problem with automated debugging. Recent software systems usually feature an automated failure reporting component, with which a huge number of failures are collected from software end-users. In order to effectively leverage the valuable program failure data, the collected failures need to be first triaged, i.e., to locate the most severe failures, and to assign them to appropriate developers. Lying in the center of failure triage is failure indexing, which tries to group failures due to the fault together. In this thesis, we propose a statistical debugging-based approach to program failure triage, called R-PROXIMITY, which better indexes failures and facilitates failure assignment than existing approaches. Finally, we describe a program dynamic slicing-based approach to failure indexing, which complements R-PROXIMITY. R-PROXIMITY is a quality failure indexing tool, but its effectiveness relies on a sufficient number of correct executions, which may or may not be available in practice. The proposed dynamic slicing-based approach does not require any correct executions, and hence perfectly complements R-PROXIMITY . All the three techniques are subject to three mid-sized programs grep, gzip, and flex, and the result validates their advancement of the state of the art.

Research on combined static and dynamic analysis in object-oriented reverse engineering

Extend Graph Based Approach For Reverse Engineering Component Based Software

A Research and Application of Dynamic Binding Technology

Research on Reverse Engineering Technology Based on Features

Automatic approach to recovering OOD models from C++ programs

Dynamic Analysis and Debugging of Binary Code for Security Applications

Scalable and Extensible Static Memory Safety Analysis with Summary over Access Path

An Empirical Study of Java Dynamic Call Graph Extractors

Understanding and Analyzing Java Reflection

Statistical debugging and automated program failure triage

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1016.2010.00736Combined Static and Dynamic Immutability Analysis of Java Program

Reflection Analysis for Java: Uncovering More Reflective Targets Precisely

A Function Call Graph Extraction Method Combining Static and Dynamic Analysis

Evaluating and Integrating Diverse Bug Finders for Effective Program Analysis

An Integration of Several Different Data Flow Analysis Techniques

An Automatic Object State Machine Extraction Method Using Dynamic Analysis

Combined Static and Dynamic Immutability Analysis of Java Program: Combined Static and Dynamic Immutability Analysis of Java Program

From Code to Design: A Reverse Engineering Approach

Extraction and Visualization of Architectural Structure Based on Cross References among Object Files

Dynamic Slicing Object-Oriented Programs For Debugging

The Dynamics of Software Composition Analysis