New Findings in Anatomy of Blood Supply to Rat Femur Isolated Vascularized Bone Marrow Transplantation Model
Heng Zhu,Feng Xie,Qingfeng Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000438214.80583.38
2014-01-01
Transplantation
Abstract:Vascularized bone marrow transplantation (VBMT) was first described in 1985 by Black (1). It is a possible method of introducing donor-specific tolerance in allotransplantation, especially vascularized composite tissue allotransplantations. Suzuki then performed rat femur allotransplantation as an isolated vascularized bone marrow transplantation (iVBMT) model, excluding the confounding effects of skin, connective tissue, and muscular tissue observed in the VBMT study (2). The iVBMT shows good chimerism rates in the early stage after transplantation (3–8). However, all these grafts became fibrosed approximately 2 months after the transplantation, and the chimerism rate dropped dramatically. We think this finding might be related to an insufficient anatomical knowledge of the blood supply of the femur. This is the foundation for establishing this iVBMT model. However, differences exist in the descriptions of the rat femoral vascular supply in different papers. Here, we reviewed these differences and present our findings regarding the circulatory system of this model. The anatomical terminology in this article is in accordance with Greene’s Anatomy of the Rat (9). The experiment is approved by Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. Ten rats were perfused with red latex through the abdominal aorta, and the hind limbs on both sides were dissected under a surgical microscope. The unilateral nutrient artery (NA) of the femur was ligated in other five rats, followed by contrast agent injection through the abdominal aorta and micro-CT scanning. We found that the blood supply of the rat femur is as follows: proximal part of the rat femur, medial circumflex femoral artery (MCFA), and lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA); middle part, NA, periosteal artery (PA) from the SCIA (PA-SCIA), and PA from the highest genicular artery (PA-HGA); and distal part, highest genicular artery (HGA), middle genicular artery (MGA), and lateral superior genicular artery (LSGA) (Fig. 1A,B). Among all these vessels, the NA is a relatively big vessel and directly enters the femoral shaft. The micro-CT scanning also showed marked differences in blood supply between the ligated side and the contralateral side, indicating the importance of the NA in femoral blood supply (Fig. 1C,D). Additionally, two origins of the NA were identified in our study: one from the SCIA and the other from the LCFA. When the NA branched from the proximal part of the SCIA, it ran downwards and passed between the pectineal muscle and the medial vastus muscle. When the NA was a terminal branch of the LCFA, it ran between the psoas and quadriceps femoris. The first type of NA (NA-SCIA) entered the femur just lateral to the less trochanter, while the second type (NA-LCFA) entered the femur at a higher position (Fig. 1E,F). The femur was predominantly supplied by one of these two NAs, and the other NA, if present, was very small. In our study of 10 rats (20 femurs), the rate of the NA-SCIA was 55%, while that of NA-LCFA was 45%.FIGURE 1: A, blood supply of the rat femur, superior view of the graft. B, blood supply of the rat femur, inferior view of the graft. MCFA, medial circumflex femoral artery; LCFA, lateral circumflex femoral artery; NA, nutrient artery; PA-SCIA, periosteal artery from superficial circumflex iliac artery; PA-HGA, periosteal artery from highest genicular artery; HGA, highest genicular artery; MGA, middle genicular artery; LSGA, lateral superior genicular artery. C, differences in blood supply between the side with ligation of the nutrient artery (NA; left) and the contralateral side (right) in the same rat, after contrast agent perfusion. D, micro-CT scanning of the same femurs in C. E, first kind of NA that arises from superficial circumflex iliac artery. F, second type of NA that arises from lateral circumflex femur artery.In previous studies, two to four vessels were found to supply the femur (2–4), namely, the LCFA, MCFA, LSGA, and NA-SCIA. Some authors preserved two vessels (2, 5, 6), while others preserved three vessels in the iVBMT models (3, 7). Only one author preserved all four vessels (4). However, our study suggested the blood supply of the rat femur is more complex than any of the previous descriptions, and the PA-SCIA, PA-HGA, MGA, and HGA were firstly noticed in the blood supply of the rat femur. There have been three studies on the anatomy of the NA of the rat femur (2, 5, 9); in all of them, the NA originated from the SCIA. In our experiment, the importance of the NA to the blood supply of the femur was demonstrated. Also, two origins of the NA were recorded, which is important to know to protect this vessel during graft harvest and to decide whether to use the femoral vessels or the common iliac vessels as the pedicle for the graft. In general, we should preserve as many vessels supplying the graft as possible. The MCFA and LCFA both originate from the hypogastric trunk, approximately 2 to 4 mm above the inguinal ligament, and are relatively difficult to be dissected. If the MCFA and LCFA are preserved, the common iliac artery should be used as the graft pedicle. The MGA and LSGA are located in the popliteal fossa, and the HGA arises from the femoral artery. All three vessels can be easily preserved. The two PAs in the middle portion of the femur are narrow and can be easily damaged during dissection; therefore, we recommend that at least a thin layer of muscle tissue should be retained at this site. On the basis of our results, we recommend that careful attention should be paid to the NA and its common variations during dissection in this model. Our study confirmed the feasibility of isolating the vessels and preparing the graft reproducibly for the iVBMT model. Also, the new findings might help refine the iVBMT model and reduce the risk of suboptimal perfusion of the vascularized bone marrow graft confounding experimental interpretation. Hainan Zhu 1 Feng Xie1 QingFeng Li1 1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai, China