Abstract:Akin to many jurisdictions, Switzerland has a dual system of sanctions comprising sentences and measures. To order a therapeutic measure per Article 59 or 63 of the Swiss Criminal Code, the presence of a "severe mental disorder" must be determined. Before the new legal precedent, this required a medical diagnosis according to recognised classification systems like the ICD or DSM. The court then decided if a disorder was "severe" in the legal sense, thereby requiring such a therapeutic measure. However, in two 2019 rulings, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court concluded that a severe mental disorder could legally exist without a diagnosis according to the ICD or DSM, if it is based on offence- and risk-relevant personality-related factors amenable to risk-reducing therapy. We examine the details and context of the rulings, alongside their wider dangers. Specifically, we outline how undue influence could be exerted by non-ICD/DSM diagnostic systems, which were developed within individual theoretical schools of thought and lack empirical validation, like in these two court cases. Such non-manual diagnoses could make the presence of a severe mental disorder dependent upon whether an expert witness employs a particular diagnostic system, which would undermine principles of legality. Moreover, the Court's requirement that the disorder is based on personality-related risk factors amenable to risk-reducing therapy is problematic because research has highlighted the low effectiveness of treatment provided independently of a psychiatric disorder. Finally, broadening entry criteria may increase the number of offenders who require psychiatric treatment, thus endangering the quality of care for those with ICD/DSM-based diagnoses that are known to respond well to treatment (e.g. schizophrenia). In short, fulfilling the Court's request that any non-manual diagnoses are based on personality-related risk factors that are amenable to risk-reducing therapy is not possible for such non-manual diagnoses. Using unvalidated diagnoses could also render the system susceptible to ethical issues and hypothetical misuse, which may adversely affect society's most vulnerable people. To counter these dangers, we suggest that in order to be admissible in court, any diagnostic system must mandatorily fulfil sufficient scientific standards.

[Diagnosis of "unspecified Psychotic Disorder" in Identifying Criminal Responsibility].

Risk factors to suicide risk in misdiagnosed bipolar disorder II treated for major depressive disorder

Relation Factors of the Criminal Responsibility in the Offenders with Mental Disorders by the Discriminatory Analysis

Correlation between psychiatric symptom and the index offence of 3 4 1 schizophrenic offenders for criminal responsibility assessment

The Comparison of Disposal Attitudes Towards Forensic Psychiatric Patients among Police Officers, Psychiatrists and Community Members in China.

Status of mandatory treatment of mentally ill offenders without criminal responsibility in China: Information from 5,262 mandatory treatment judgments

Analysis on the correlative characteristics of mental disorder patients with illegal behaviors

Prodromal Psychosis Detection in A Counseling Center Population in China: an Epidemiological and Clinical Study

Chinese Psychiatrists Views on Global Features of Ccmd-Iii, Icd-10 and Dsm-Iv

The dangers of using diagnoses outside of established psychiatric nosology in the courtroom: Analysis and discussion of current Swiss legal precedent from a medical perspective

Is there a symptomatic distinction between the affective psychoses and schizophrenia? A machine learning approach

An investigation of Chinese psychiatrists' attitude to mentally ill person and their disposing policies in the three sites of China

Diagnosis of schizophrenia by integrated saccade scores and associations with psychiatric symptoms, and functioning

Duration of untreated illness and its influential factors in schizophrenia

Screening Schizotypal Personality Disorder for Detection of Clinical High Risk of Psychosis in Chinese Mental Health Services

Informed consent competency and related factors in patients with schizophrenia

Chinese Forensic Psychiatry: History, Development and Challenges

Lost diagnoses? A multi-year trajectory of patients with childhood ADHD in the criminal justice system in Switzerland

A causing factor analysis of divergence in forensic psychiatric exper tise

Forensic psychiatric analysis of organic personality disorders after craniocerebral injury in Shanghai, China

Relationship Between Cognitive and Clinical Insight at Different Durations of Untreated Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms in High-Risk Individuals.