An open-labeled, randomized comparative study of lamotrigine and lithium in treatment of bipolar depression

马燕桃,陈玉芳,钟宝亮,于欣
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1003-3734.2008.23.015
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of lamotrigine(LMG) in treatment of Chinese patients with bipolar depression.Methods: Totally 34 patients with bipolar depression were randomly divided into 2 groups,and were treated with either lamortrigine(5~200mg·d-1,n=18) or lithium(75~1500mg·d-1,n=16) in an 8-weeks' open-labeled and randomized study.The evaluation scales included Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(HAMD-17),Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale(MADRS),and Clinical Global Impressions(CGI).Results: At the end of the treatment,the scores of HAMD-17 decreased significantly in both lamotrigine and lithium groups;the baseline HAMD scores were significantly decreased by 24.8% and 47.4%,respectively.Based on the decreasing rate of HAMD,the response rates to lamotrigine(33.3%) and lithium(50%) were not significantly different(P=0.324).In lamotrigine group,the body weight did not change,but two cases of rash were found.Other adverse effects were similar in both groups.Conclusions: In this pilot study lamotrigine has shown to be partially effective for improving mild or moderate bipolar depression with good safety.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?