Combination of olfactory ensheathing cells from the olfactory mucosa and muscle basal lamina for the treatment of spinal cord injury

Bin Jia,Jie Li,Xi-jing He,Jin-lan Yu,Zun-jin Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2008.51.005
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To study the effect of olfactory ensheathing cells from olfactory mucosa and muscle basal lamina on spinal cord injury following combined transplantation of muscle basal lamina. Methods: One Sprague Dawley rats received a median incision on the back. About 1.5 cm×0.8 cm ×0.6 cm muscle was removed along the muscle fiber, re-warmed, washed and crushed to discard sarcoplasm so as to make muscle basal lamina. Olfactory mucosa was harvested from 4 Sprague Dawley rats following anesthesia. Olfactory ensheathing cells were collected and culture by collagenase digestion at 10161/ L. A total of 50 Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned into 5 groups, olfactory ensheathing cells + muscle basal lamina group, olfactory ensheathing cells group, muscle basal lamina group, model group and normal group, 10 rats for each group. Except the normal group, spinal cord injury models were created in other groups. 2-mm spinal cord was excised following transaction at T10. Olfactory ensheathing cells and muscle basal lamina were implanted into the broken ends of the spinal cord at 7 days. Bridge grafting was performed using gel sponge dipped with DMEM in the model group. Results: At 8 weeks following transplantation, motor function of rats in the olfactory ensheathing cells + muscle basal lamina group, olfactory ensheathing cells group was significantly improved, with the presence of gross movement of big joints. Basso Beattie and Bresnahan score was greater in the former group (P < 0.01). Slight activity of small joints were shown in the muscle basal lamina group. Contracture of the posterior limb was severe, no significant improvement in the model group. Latencies of somatosensory evoked potential and motion evoked potential were significantly lower in the olfactory ensheathing cells + muscle basal lamina group compared with other groups (P < 0.01). Hematoxylin-eosin staining and nuclear factor immunohistochemistry showed a good integration of grafts and the injured spinal cord, with the presence of positive long fibers in the olfactory ensheathing cell + muscle basal lamina group and olfactory ensheathing cell group; Porosis was displayed in the muscle basal lamina group, with a few irregular positive fibers. Scar tissues were filled in the broken region in the model group. Conclusion: Olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation can promote axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. As a biological pipe, the combination of muscle basal lamina and olfactory ensheathing cells can significantly improve the axonal regeneration and function recovery after spinal cord injury.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?