STENT AND SHIP: SAFETY OF EARLY TRANSFER AFTER PCI OF STEMI PATIENTS FROM A SINGLE, REGIONAL CARDIAC CARE CENTRE
S. Liu,L. Lau,R. Nepomuceno,S. Leon,K. Ducas-Mowchun,O. Toleva,D. Allen,L. Avery,R. Fransoo,J. Ducas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.07.242
IF: 6.614
2017-01-01
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:Centres that perform percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have resources specialized to the care of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients both during and after PCI. Due to limited hospital resources, some PCI-capable centres transfer STEMI patients to non-PCI capable centres following successful PCI. Our objective is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of our current practice of transferring patients to non-PCI capable centres following successful PCI in a single, tertiary care regional PCI centre. A retrospective case control study was performed on consecutive STEMI patients between July 2013 and June 2014 at St. Boniface Hospital, the sole cardiac centre in the province of Manitoba. We included patients who presented directly to the PCI-capable centre, brought in by emergency medical services, or referred from a non-PCI capable hospital. Primary, pharmacoinvasive (following successful thrombolytics) and rescue (following unsuccessful thrombolytics) PCI cases were included. High-risk patients deemed unsuitable for transfer (presenting with cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, mechanical complication of STEMI or not revascularized) were excluded. Patients were analyzed based on whether or not they were transferred to a non-PCI capable centre. Clinical presentation, comorbidities, angiography and revascularization, transfer status, and one-year outcomes were collected from the electronic medical record and cath lab database. A total of 554 patients were screened and 196 cases met the exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 358 patients (62±13 years, 79% male), 136 patients (38%) were admitted to the PCI-capable centre and 222 patients (62%) were transferred following PCI. Median time of transfer was 141 minutes and 73% of transfer occurred within 5 hours. Baseline demographics including age, gender, cardiac risk factors and medications were similar between the two groups. There were also no differences in cardiac enzymes, left ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic pressure, culprit vessel, type of PCI, residual disease, and PCI-related complications. There was no statistically significant difference for admitted vs transferred patients in all-cause mortality (2.2% vs 3.6%, p=0.78) or repeat revascularization (4.4% vs 3.6%, p=0.54) at one year. Subgroup analysis of admitted patients compared with early transferred patients (length of stay < 5 hours, n=148) revealed no statistically significant difference in one-year all-cause mortality (2.2% vs 3.3%, p=0.78) or repeat revascularization (4.4% vs 5.4%, p=0.73). This analysis suggests there is no increased risk of mortality or repeat revascularization at one year in STEMI patients who are transferred from a cardiac centre in the first 5 hours following successful PCI.