Inadequate Glycaemic Control and Antidiabetic Therapy among Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Guangdong Province of China.

Bi Yan,Yan Jin-hua,Liao Zhi-hong,Li Yan-Bing,Zeng Long-yi,Tang Kuan-xiao,Xue Yao-ming,Yang Hua-Zhang,Li Lu,Cai De-hong,Wu Ge,Zhang Fan,Lin Shao-da,Xiao Zheng-hua,Zhu Da-long,Weng Jian-ping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200804020-00003
2008-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Diabetes mellitus has become epidemic in recent years in China. We investigated the prevalence of hyperglycaemia and inadequate glycaemic control among type 2 diabetic inpatients from ten university teaching hospitals in Guangdong Province, China.METHODS:Inadequate glycaemic control in diabetic patients was defined as HbA1c = 6.5%. Therapeutic regimens included no-intervention, lifestyle only, oral antiglycemic agents (OA), insulin plus OA (insulin + OA), or insulin only. Antidiabetic managements included monotherapy, double therapy, triple or quadruple therapy.RESULTS:Among 493 diabetic inpatients with known history, 75% had HbA1c = 6.5%. Inadequate glucose control rates were more frequently seen in patients on insulin + OA regimen (97%) than on OA regimen (71%) (P < 0.001), and more frequent in patients on combination therapy (81% - 96%) than monotherapy (75%) (P < 0.05). Patients on insulin differed significantly from patients on OA by mean HbA1c, glycemic control rate, diabetes duration, microvascular complications, and BMI (P < 0.01).CONCLUSIONS:This study showed that glycaemic control of type 2 diabetic patients deteriorated for patients who received insulin and initiation time of insulin was usually delayed. It is up to clinicians to move from the traditional stepwise therapy to a more active and early combination antidiabetic therapy to provide better glucose control.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?