Solid gastric emptying function in patients with functional dyspepsia fulfilling Rome III criteria

Zhiqiang Song,Meiyun Ke,Zhifeng Wang,Libo Chen,Zhenghua Wang,Xiucai Fang,Xiaohong Liu
2008-01-01
Abstract:Background: In Rome III criteria, the definition of functional dyspepsia (FD) was updated and revised, which had resulted in the alteration of FD population. Aims: To investigate the solid gastric emptying function in FD patients fulfilling Rome III criteria and the correlation of solid gastric emptying function with symptoms and diagnostic categories of FD. Methods: Thirty-six FD patients fulfilling Rome III criteria and 32 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. The solid gastric emptying function was determined by 99Tc-labeled scintigraphic method and was mutually compared among FD patients with different diagnostic categories. The correlations of solid gastric emptying function with FD symptoms in Rome III criteria were analyzed. Results: Ten (27.8%) FD patients had a longer solid gastric half emptying time than upper limits of normal, while 9 (25.0%) had a higher residue rate of 2 hours than upper limits of normal. The solid gastric half emptying time of patients with postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), epigastric pain syndrome (EPS), and PDS+EPS were (150.3 ±40.2) min, (118.3±25.1) min, and (150.5±51.2) min, respectively, no significant difference was found between these three groups (P=0.126). Bothersome postprandial fullness was positively correlated with both solid gastric half emptying time and residue rate of 2 hours, the correlation coefficients were 11.5 (P=0.043) and 0.045 (P= 0.040), respectively. Conclusions: Delayed solid gastric emptying was present in 27.8% of FD patients enrolled in this study. Patients with PDS and PDS+EPS appear to have a longer solid gastric half emptying time than EPS. Bothersome postprandial fullness is correlated with delayed solid gastric emptying in FD patients. Delayed solid gastric emptying is one of the pathophysiologic mechanisms in FD patients fulfilling Rome III criteria.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?