Abstract:ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the role of spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT) quantitative parameters and their derived quantitative parameters combined with lesion morphological information in the differential diagnosis of solid SPNs. MethodsThis retrospective study included basic clinical data and SDCT images of 132 patients with pathologically confirmed SPNs (102 and 30 patients in the malignant and benign groups, respectively). The morphological signs of SPNs were evaluated and the region of interest (ROI) was delineated from the lesion to extract and calculate the relevant SDCT quantitative parameters, and standardise the process. Differences in qualitative and quantitative parameters between the groups were statistically analysed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the efficacy of the corresponding parameters in the diagnosis of benign and malignant SPNs. Statistically significant clinical data, CT signs and SDCT quantitative parameters were analysed using multivariate logistic regression to determine the independent risk factors for predicting benign and malignant SPNs, and the best multi-parameter regression model was established. Inter-observer repeatability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. ResultsMalignant SPNs differed from benign SPNs in terms of size, lesion morphology, short spicule sign, and vascular enrichment sign (P< 0.05). The SDCT quantitative parameters and their derived quantitative parameters of malignant SPNs (SAR(40keV), SAR(70keV), Delta(40keV), Delta(70keV), CER40keV, CER70keV, NEF40keV, NEF70keV, lambda, NIC, NZ(eff)) were significantly higher than those of benign SPNs (P< 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, most parameters could distinguish between benign and adenocarcinoma groups (SAR(40keV), SAR(70keV), Delta(40keV), Delta(70keV), CER40keV, CER70keV, NEF40keV, NEF70keV, lambda, NIC, and NZ(eff)), and between benign and squamous cell carcinoma groups (SAR(40keV), SAR70(keV), Delta(40keV), Delta(70keV), NEF40keV, NEF70keV, lambda, and NIC). However, there were no significant differences between the parameters in the adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma groups. ROC curve analysis indicated that NIC, NEF70keV, and NEF40keV had higher diagnostic efficacy for differentiating benign and malignant SPNs (area under the curve [AUC]:0.869, 0.854, and 0.853, respectively), and NIC was the highest. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that size (OR=1.138, 95% CI 1.022-1.267, P=0.019), Delta(70keV) (OR=1.060, 95% CI 1.002-1.122, P=0.043), and NIC (OR=7.758, 95% CI 1.966-30.612, P=0.003) were independent risk factors for the prediction of benign and malignant SPNs. ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of size, Delta(70keV), NIC, and a combination of the three for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant SPNs were 0.636, 0.846, 0.869, and 0.903, respectively. The AUC for the combined parameters was the largest, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.2%, 83.3% and 86.4%, respectively. The SDCT quantitative parameters and their derived quantitative parameters in this study exhibited satisfactory inter-observer repeatability (ICC: 0.811-0.997). ConclusionSDCT quantitative parameters and their derivatives can be helpful in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid SPNs. The quantitative parameter, NIC, is superior to the other relevant quantitative parameters and when NIC is combined with lesion size and Delta(70keV) value for comprehensive diagnosis, the efficacy could be further improved.

Diagnostic value of artificial neural network in solitary pulmonary nodules

Application of Artificial Neural Networks in the CT Study of Solitary Pulmonary Nodule

Using Data Mining Techniques to Establish Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Diagnosis Model

Neural Network-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Distinguishing Malignant from Benign Solitary Pulmonary Nodules by Computed Tomography

Classification decision tree in CT imaging:application to the differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules

Convolutional Neural Network-Based Diagnostic Model for a Solid, Indeterminate Solitary Pulmonary Nodule or Mass on Computed Tomography

Radiological Features of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules and Diagnostic Value of Two Lung Cancer Prediction Models for Distinguishing Malignancy

Establishment and verification of prediction model for benign or malignant of≤20 mm solitary pulmonary nodules

Value of CT-Based Deep Learning Model in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Solid Pulmonary Nodules ≤ 8 mm

The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Mathematical Prediction Model in Diagnosis of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules

Diagnostic value of computed tomography scanning in differentiating malignant from benign solitary pulmonary nodules:a systematic review with meta-analysis

Dual-layer detector spectral CT-based machine learning models in the differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules

Value of Dual-Layer Spectral Detector Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Benign/malignant Solid Solitary Pulmonary Nodules and Establishment of a Prediction Model

Radiological Features of Solitary Pulmonary Nodule (spn) and Application of Two Lung Cancer Prediction Models

Development of a Diagnostic Model for Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Based on Radiomics Features

Quantitative analysis on the CT diagnosis value of peripheral solitary pulmonary nodule with nodule ;notch due to pleural indentation

The application of dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography in solitary pulmonary nodule identification

Classification decision tree algorithm assisting in diagnosing solitary pulmonary nodule by SPECT/CT fusion imaging

Qualitative (and Quantitative) Values of the Lung-RADS and Computed Tomography in Diagnosing Solitary Pulmonary Nodules

Artificial neural networks improve LDCT lung cancer screening: a comparative validation study

Application of Bayesian Theory Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis System in CT Diagnosis of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules